A. On or before December 1 each year, the director shall report on the drug and alcohol treatment programs available to offenders in this state who are under the jurisdiction of the department. The report shall include:
1. A description of each program, including whether the program is for offenders who are imprisoned or for offenders who are on community supervision or parole.
2. The number of offenders who are currently receiving services from a program and the total number of offenders who received services over the previous twelve months.
3. The cost per offender for each program and the source of the monies that are used.
4. The name of each drug and alcohol treatment program provider.
5. A comparison of the drug and alcohol treatment programs that are offered to:
(a) Offenders who are in a department facility.
(b) Offenders who are in a private prison that contracts with the department.
(c) Offenders who are on community supervision or parole.
B. The report shall be submitted to the governor, the president of the senate and the speaker of the house of representatives and a copy of this report shall be provided to the secretary of state.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
5
cases (
1 in the last 5 years), 1997–2021 · leading case:
State v. Hensley, 31 P.3d 848 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2001).
State v. Hensley, 31 P.3d 848 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2001).
· cites it 12× “15 (then A.R.S. § 41-1604.14) contained a definition of "violent crime" that was identical to the definition now set forth in A.”
State v. Benak, 18 P.3d 127 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2001).
· cites it 2× “01(B) referred to “violent crime as defined [in] § 41-1604.14, subsection B,” another section that originated in the initiative measure.”
Baker v. Superior Court for Maricopa Cty., 947 P.2d 910 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1997).
· cites it 3× “section 41-1604.14 (Supp.1996), which defines “violent crime” in terms which essentially mirror the definition of a dangerous nature felony used in several subsections of existing A.”
United States v. Jose Madrid-Becerra, 14 F.4th 1096 (9th Cir. 2021).
· cites it 4× “” After serving a portion of a 2013 Arizona state sentence in prison, the defendant was granted early conditional release under Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 41-1604.14 (repealed Aug.”
State v. Ventura (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017).
“Immigration and Customs Enforcement after serving one-half of his sentence pursuant to former Arizona Revised Statutes section 41-1604.14. 2016 Ariz. Sess. Laws, ch.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 41-1604.14(B) — 2 cases
State v. Hensley, 31 P.3d 848 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2001).
“15 (then A.R.S. § 41-1604.14) contained a definition of "violent crime" that was identical to the definition now set forth in A.”
Baker v. Superior Court for Maricopa Cty., 947 P.2d 910 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1997).
“section 41-1604.14 (Supp.1996), which defines “violent crime” in terms which essentially mirror the definition of a dangerous nature felony used in several subsections of existing A.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.