Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 41-2411 (2026)

Arizona automated fingerprint identification system; development and implementation

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. The Arizona automated fingerprint identification system is established in the department of public safety for the purpose of retaining fingerprint files to be used by the department and other authorized criminal justice automated fingerprint identification sites to make fingerprint identifications for criminal justice and noncriminal justice purposes specifically permitted pursuant to law.

B. The Arizona automated fingerprint identification system is an automated system consisting of:

1. A central fingerprint repository operated and maintained by the department of public safety.

2. Two remote full access system terminals which are operated and maintained by a law enforcement agency designated by the Arizona automated fingerprint identification system advisory board.

C. The department of public safety shall procure the necessary equipment and services to establish the system.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1997–1998 · leading case: In Re John G., 953 P.2d 1258 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1998).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

In Re John G., 953 P.2d 1258 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1998). “§ 8-241(0), now renumbered as § 8-24KT), 1 provides as follows: If a juvenile has been adjudicated delinquent for an offense that if committed by an adult would be a felony, the court shall provide the department of public safety Arizona automated fingerprint identification…”

In Re Abraham F., 947 P.2d 1368 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 2× “That statute provides in pertinent part: If a juvenile has been adjudicated delinquent for an offense that if committed by an adult would be a felony, the court shall provide the department of public safety Arizona automated fingerprint identification system established in §…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.