Arizona Revised Statutes
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 44-1407 (2026)
Civil penalty and injunctive enforcement
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official)
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
The attorney general or a county attorney with the permission or at the request of the attorney general may bring an action for appropriate injunctive or other equitable relief and civil penalties and as determined by the court, taxable costs, such other fees and expenses reasonably incurred and reasonable attorney fees, in the name of the state for a violation of this article. The court may assess for the benefit of the state a civil penalty of not more than one hundred fifty thousand dollars for each violation of this article.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 2000–2018 · leading case: California v. Infineon Tech. AG, 531 F. Supp. 2d 1124 (N.D. Cal. 2007).
California v. Infineon Tech. AG, 531 F. Supp. 2d 1124 (N.D. Cal. 2007). “Arizona’s antitrust statute contains two relevant provisions: Ariz.Rev.Stat. §§ 44-1407 and 44-1408. The former grants the Attorney General permission to bring an appropriate action for “injunctive or other equitable relief .”
Fed. Trade Comm'n v. Mylan Labs., Inc., 205 F.R.D. 369 (D.D.C. 2002). “580(a)-(b); Ariz.Rev.Stat.Ann. §§ 44-1407, 44-1412; Ariz.”
Murcott v. Best W. Int'l, Inc., 9 P.3d 1088 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2000). “See A.R.S. § 44-1407. Moreover, private parties may be entitled to treble damages, a punitive sanction.”
Brixen & Christopher Architects, P.C. v. State, 2001 UT App 210 (Utah Ct. App. 2001). “See Ariz.Rev.Stat. § 44-1407 (2000) (stating "attorney general may bring an action for appropriate injunctive or other equitable relief and civil penalties").”
In re Packaged Seafood Prods. Antitrust Litig., 338 F. Supp. 3d 1079 (S.D. Cal. 2018). “" Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 44-1407 . The plain language of the statute references the attorney general and authorizes the attorney general to bring suit in the name of the state.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.