Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 44
Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 44-1410 (2026)

Limitations of actions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. An action under section 44-1407 to recover a civil penalty is barred if it is not commenced within four years after the cause of action accrues.

B. An action under section 44-1408 to recover damages is barred if it is not commenced within four years after the cause of action accrues, or within one year after the conclusion of any timely action brought by the state under section 44-1407 or 44-1408, subsection A, based in whole or in part on any matter complained of in the action for damages, whichever is later.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1995–2017 · leading case: In re Nexium, 968 F. Supp. 2d 367 (D. Mass. 2013).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In re Nexium, 968 F. Supp. 2d 367 (D. Mass. 2013). “1 ("Any civil action to enforce any cause of action for a violation of this chapter shall be commenced within four years after the cause of action accrued.”
Supreme Auto Transp. LLC v. Arcelor Mittal, 238 F. Supp. 3d 1032 (N.D. Ill. 2017). “Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 44-1410 (A) (antitrust statute of limitations ("SOL”) period of 4 years); Cal.”
State v. Jackson, 908 P.2d 1081 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1995). · cites it 2× “§§ 6-153(C), 6-943(H), 6-975(B), 6-1112(C) (1989 and Supp.1995). Other statutes merely state the time-period during which an action "may” be brought.”
In re Pool Prods. Distrib. Mkt. Antitrust Litig., 946 F. Supp. 2d 554 (E.D. La. 2013). “Code § 17208; Ariz.Rev.Stat. § 44-1410. For the reasons discussed in the DPP Order and Reasons, plaintiffs’ allegations are woefully inadequate to plead fraudulent concealment.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 44-1410(A) — 1 case
In re Nexium, 968 F. Supp. 2d 367 (D. Mass. 2013). “1 ("Any civil action to enforce any cause of action for a violation of this chapter shall be commenced within four years after the cause of action accrued.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.