Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 44-1530 (2026)

Assurance of discontinuance of unlawful practice

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

In the enforcement of the provisions of this article, the attorney general may accept an assurance of discontinuance of any act or practice deemed in violation of the provisions of this article from any person engaging in, or who has engaged in, such act or practice. Such assurance may include a stipulation for the payment by such person of reasonable expenses incurred by the attorney general or as restitution to aggrieved persons, or both. Any such assurance shall be in writing and shall be filed with and subject to the approval of the superior court of the county in which the alleged violator resides or has its principal place of business or in Maricopa county. A violation of such assurance within six years of the filing thereof shall constitute prima facie proof of a violation of the provisions of this article. Such assurance of discontinuance shall not be considered an admission of a violation for any purpose.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1973–2011 · leading case: State Ex Rel. Horne v. Autozone, Inc., 258 P.3d 289 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2011).
State Ex Rel. Horne v. Autozone, Inc., 258 P.3d 289 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 4× “A.R.S. § 44-1530 (2003). Various civil penalties are created.”
People Ex Rel. Babbitt v. Green Acres Trust, 618 P.2d 1086 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1980). · cites it 2× “See A.R.S. § 44-1530. After taking these matters under advisement, the trial court ruled by minute entry that sale by Green Acres Trust of its debentures in connection with the promotion of its funeral operations and Green Acres Memorial Gardens’ cemetery business constituted…”
Sellinger v. Freeway Mobile Home Sales, Inc., 511 P.2d 682 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1973). “” The following statutes are also pertinent to the issues: “§ 44-1530. Assurance of discontinuance of unlawful practice.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.