Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 44-1567 (2026)

Action for damages; other remedies; defense

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. Any wholesaler may bring an action against a supplier or a supplier may bring an action against a wholesaler for violation of section 44-1566 in any court of competent jurisdiction and may recover damages sustained. In such action the prevailing party shall receive reasonable attorney fees.

B. The remedies provided in this section are independent of and supplemental to any other remedy or remedies available to the wholesaler or supplier in law or equity.

C. In any action pursuant to this section for termination, cancellation or failure to renew a franchise in violation of section 44-1566, it shall be a complete defense to prove that the termination, cancellation or failure to renew was done in good faith and for good cause.

D. A person violating section 44-1566 shall not be subject to criminal prosecution as provided in section 4-246 for such violation.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1984–1985 · leading case: Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Mem'l Hosp., 710 P.2d 1025 (Ariz. 1985).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Mem'l Hosp., 710 P.2d 1025 (Ariz. 1985). · cites it 4× “1984) (interpreting "prevailing party" for purposes of an attorney's fees award under A.R.S. § 44-1567(A)). By way of contrast, A.”

All Am. Distrib. Co., Inc. v. Miller Brewing Co., 736 F.2d 530 (9th Cir. 1984). “All American subsequently withdrew from arbitration and Miller sought to recover its attorney fees as a prevailing party, under Ariz.Rev.Stat. Ann. § 44-1567 A, on the claim for injunctive relief.”

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 44-1567(A) — 1 case

Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Mem'l Hosp., 710 P.2d 1025 (Ariz. 1985). “1984) (interpreting "prevailing party" for purposes of an attorney's fees award under A.R.S. § 44-1567(A)). By way of contrast, A.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.