Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 44-1973 (2026)

Conduct of hearing

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. Any hearing under this article may be held before the commission, a member thereof, the director, or other authorized officer of the commission as the commission directs.

B. Conduct of the hearing shall be governed by this section, and by the rules of practice and procedure which may be adopted by the commission. Neither the commission nor any member thereof, nor the director, nor other authorized officer of the commission, shall be bound by the technical rules of evidence in the conduct of hearings under this article, and no informality in any proceeding, as in the manner of taking testimony, shall invalidate any order, decision, rule or regulation made, approved or confirmed by the commission.

C. A stenographic record of all proceedings and testimony shall be made of each hearing by a shorthand reporter appointed by the commission, and the record shall be reduced to writing and filed with the commission.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1999–2022 · leading case: Jennings v. Woods, 982 P.2d 274 (Ariz. 1999).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Jennings v. Woods, 982 P.2d 274 (Ariz. 1999). · cites it 4× “The majority's concern over action by a two-member commission, ante, at ¶ 70, neglects A.R.S. § 44-1973 which allows the commission to act with fewer than all its members.”

Ventures 7000 v. Acc (Ariz. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 2× “2 See A.R.S. § 44-1973(A); A.A.C. §§ R14-3-102(G), -109(A) (hearing officer authorized by the Commission may preside over enforcement hearings).”

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 44-1973(A) — 1 case

Ventures 7000 v. Acc (Ariz. Ct. App. 2022). “2 See A.R.S. § 44-1973(A); A.A.C. §§ R14-3-102(G), -109(A) (hearing officer authorized by the Commission may preside over enforcement hearings).”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.