Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 44-2000 (2026)

Contrary stipulations void

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Any condition, stipulation or provision binding any person acquiring any security to waive compliance with this chapter or chapter 13 of this title or of the rules of the commission is void.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2010–2021 · leading case: R & L Ltd. Investments, Inc. v. Cabot Inv. Props., LLC, 729 F. Supp. 2d 1110 (D. Ariz. 2010).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

R & L Ltd. Investments, Inc. v. Cabot Inv. Props., LLC, 729 F. Supp. 2d 1110 (D. Ariz. 2010). · cites it 8× “Here, it appears that subsection (b) applies; Arizona’s Securities Act, A.R.S. § 44-2000, prohibits and voids choice-of-law provisions that purport to waive the applicability of the Arizona Securities Act: Any condition, stipulation, or provision binding any person acquiring an…”

Kingsley Capital Mgmt., LLC v. Sly, 820 F. Supp. 2d 1011 (D. Ariz. 2011). · cites it 2× “A.R.S. § 44-2000. However, the Arizona Securities Act does not prohibit arbitration of claims brought under its provisions.”

Collins v. Glick (Ariz. Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 3× “See A.R.S. § 44-2000. ¶10 The arbitration clause of the Agreement also declares that “You understand that this agreement to arbitrate does not constitute a waiver of your rights to seek statutorily imposed remedies in the arbitration, or to seek a judicial forum, where such…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.