Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 47-2317 (2026)

Cumulation and conflict of warranties express or implied

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Warranties whether express or implied shall be construed as consistent with each other and as cumulative, but if such construction is unreasonable the intention of the parties shall determine which warranty is dominant. In ascertaining that intention the following rules apply:

1. Exact or technical specifications displace an inconsistent sample or model or general language of description.

2. A sample from an existing bulk displaces inconsistent general language of description.

3. Express warranties displace inconsistent implied warranties other than an implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2017–2021 · leading case: Nelson v. MillerCoors, LLC, 246 F. Supp. 3d 666 (E.D.N.Y 2017).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Nelson v. MillerCoors, LLC, 246 F. Supp. 3d 666 (E.D.N.Y 2017). “317 ; Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 47-2317 ; Ark. Code Ann.”

Flowers-Carter v. Braun Corp. (D. Ariz. 2021). · cites it 2× “A.R.S. § 47-2317 (when multiple warranties exist, they must “be construed as 7 consistent with each other and as cumulative” unless such a construction is unreasonable, 8 in which case “the intention of the parties shall determine which warranty is dominant”).”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.