Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 8
Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 8-232 (2026)

County attorney

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

If a child in a juvenile court hearing who is the subject of the petition that does not allege a delinquent act or incorrigibility is represented by counsel in a contested matter, the county attorney, when requested by the juvenile court judge, shall appear and participate in the hearing to assist in ascertaining and presenting evidence.  

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1973–1996 · leading case: In Re the Appeal in Yavapai Cnty., Juv. Action No. 7707, 543 P.2d 1154 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1975).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In Re the Appeal in Yavapai Cnty., Juv. Action No. 7707, 543 P.2d 1154 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1975). · cites it 11× “The justice of the peace in Yarnell Precinct had previously been appointed by the juvenile judge of the Superior Court of Yavapai County to act as a “traffic hearing officer” to handle traffic juvenile offenses pursuant to A.R.S. § 8-232. Following the trial in justice court,…”
Webb v. Rose, 513 P.2d 988 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1973). · cites it 4× “find A.R.S. § 8-232 which relates to traffic offenses.”
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa Cnty., Juv. Action No. JT30243, 920 P.2d 779 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1996). “section 8-232 (Supp.1995). Officers Cox and DeSanti testified, as did Appellee and two juveniles.”
In re the Appeal in Maricopa Cnty., Juv. Action No. Jt-180844, 569 P.2d 301 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1977). · cites it 12× “The juvenile then filed a motion requesting that the juvenile judge dismiss the motion for rehearing and the notice of appeal, contending that under the provisions of A.R.S. § 8-232 G, the state was not a party authorized to appeal or request a rehearing before the juvenile…”
State ex rel. McDougall v. Nastro, 800 P.2d 974 (Ariz. 1990). · cites it 2× “See generally A.R.S. § 8-232. On September 6, 1989, prior to any disposition by the court, defendant reached the age of majority.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 8-232(A) — 1 case
In Re the Appeal in Yavapai Cnty., Juv. Action No. 7707, 543 P.2d 1154 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1975). “The justice of the peace in Yarnell Precinct had previously been appointed by the juvenile judge of the Superior Court of Yavapai County to act as a “traffic hearing officer” to handle traffic juvenile offenses pursuant to A.R.S. § 8-232. Following the trial in justice court,…”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 8-232(B) — 1 case
In Re the Appeal in Yavapai Cnty., Juv. Action No. 7707, 543 P.2d 1154 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1975). “The justice of the peace in Yarnell Precinct had previously been appointed by the juvenile judge of the Superior Court of Yavapai County to act as a “traffic hearing officer” to handle traffic juvenile offenses pursuant to A.R.S. § 8-232. Following the trial in justice court,…”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 8-232(F) — 1 case
In Re the Appeal in Yavapai Cnty., Juv. Action No. 7707, 543 P.2d 1154 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1975). “The justice of the peace in Yarnell Precinct had previously been appointed by the juvenile judge of the Superior Court of Yavapai County to act as a “traffic hearing officer” to handle traffic juvenile offenses pursuant to A.R.S. § 8-232. Following the trial in justice court,…”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 8-232(G) — 1 case
In Re the Appeal in Yavapai Cnty., Juv. Action No. 7707, 543 P.2d 1154 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1975). “The justice of the peace in Yarnell Precinct had previously been appointed by the juvenile judge of the Superior Court of Yavapai County to act as a “traffic hearing officer” to handle traffic juvenile offenses pursuant to A.R.S. § 8-232. Following the trial in justice court,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.