Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 8

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 8-235

Appeals

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. Any aggrieved party in any juvenile court proceeding under this title may appeal from a final order of the juvenile court to the court of appeals in the manner provided in the Arizona rules of procedure for the juvenile court as adopted or approved by the Arizona supreme court.

B. The order of the juvenile court shall not be suspended and the execution of the order shall not be stayed pending the appeal, except that the appellate court may, by order, suspend or stay the execution of the order if suitable provision is made for the care and custody of the juvenile.

C. The court of appeals shall give the appeal precedence over all other actions except extraordinary writs or special actions.

D. The judge of the juvenile court shall appoint an attorney for an indigent party appealing a final order of the juvenile court and a reasonable sum shall be fixed by the court to be paid by the county to the attorney for the appeal.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 835 cases (381 in the last 5 years), 1956–2026 · leading case: Dominique M. v. Department of Child Safety
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Dominique M. v. Department of Child Safety (2016) arizctapp · cites it 2× “We have appellate jurisdiction pursuant to the Arizona Constitution, Article 6, Section 9; A.R.S. § 8-235(A); and Rule 103(A) of the Arizona Rules of Procedure for the Juvenile Court, ANALYSIS ¶ 6 Mother appeals only the juvenile court’s finding that severance of her parental…”
Jennifer S. v. Department of Child Safety (2016) arizctapp · cites it 2× “We have jurisdiction pursuant to A.R.S. § 8-235(A) (2014) and Rule 103(A) of the Arizona Rules of Procedure for the Juvenile Court.”
Donald W. v. Dcs, M.D. (2019) arizctapp · cites it 2× “¶24 Father timely appealed, and we have jurisdiction under A.R.S. § 8-235(A) and Arizona Rule of Procedure for the Juvenile Court 103(A).”
Raymond F. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security (2010) arizctapp · cites it 2× “and convincing evidence that: 1) Father is unable to discharge his parental responsibilities because of his chronic abuse of dangerous drugs and alcohol, and it reasonably believed Father’s drag abuse would continue; 2) diligent efforts have been made for reunification but…”
Katherine S. v. Foreman (1999) arizctapp · cites it 21× “A.R.S. § 8-235 (footnotes omitted). ¶ 3 The statute is adopted from section 53 of the Model Juvenile Court Act.”
Christy C. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security (2007) arizctapp · cites it 2× “[the court] notes this is not the first time the children were taken into care____ [Alternative family placements were considered, but ultimately rejected as they would not provide a suitably stable long-term placement____ The court also specifically found that severance was in…”
Jeffrey P. v. Department of Child Safety (2016) arizctapp · cites it 2× “2 Following trial on November 13, 2014, the superior court granted the motion to terminate both parents’ rights. ¶ 4 Father timely appealed the court’s termination order.”
Aleise H. v. Dcs (2018) arizctapp · cites it 2× “This court has jurisdiction over Mother’s timely appeal pursuant to Article 6, Section 9, of the Arizona Constitution, A.R.S. §§ 8-235(A), 12-2101(A) and 12-120.”
Christy A. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security (2007) arizctapp · cites it 2× “We have appellate jurisdiction pursuant to A.R.S. § 8-235(A) (2007) and Rule 88(A) of the Arizona Rules of Procedure for the Juvenile Court (“ARPJC”).”
Ruben M. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security (2012) arizctapp · cites it 2× “” ¶ 10 ADES filed a response to Father’s objection, stating that if Father wanted more specificity, he could “submit his own proposed Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order to the Court through his counsel.”
Roberto F. v. Department of Child Safety (2014) arizctapp · cites it 20× “We have jurisdiction pursuant to A.R.S. §§ 8-235(A), 12- 2101(A)(1). ISSUE PRESENTED ¶6 Father asserts the juvenile court lacked jurisdiction3 to enter the order of adoption while his appeal of the termination order was pending.”
Marina P. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security (2007) arizctapp · cites it 2× “At the end of the trial, the juvenile court concluded that Mother has “substantially neglected and/or has willfully refused to remedy the conditions which cause [her] children to be in out-of-home care despite the agency’s diligent efforts to provide appropriate remedial…”
Show all 835 citing cases →
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 8-235(A) — 713 cases
Dominique M. v. Department of Child Safety (2016) arizctapp “We have appellate jurisdiction pursuant to the Arizona Constitution, Article 6, Section 9; A.R.S. § 8-235(A); and Rule 103(A) of the Arizona Rules of Procedure for the Juvenile Court, ANALYSIS ¶ 6 Mother appeals only the juvenile court’s finding that severance of her parental…”
Jennifer S. v. Department of Child Safety (2016) arizctapp “We have jurisdiction pursuant to A.R.S. § 8-235(A) (2014) and Rule 103(A) of the Arizona Rules of Procedure for the Juvenile Court.”
Donald W. v. Dcs, M.D. (2019) arizctapp “¶24 Father timely appealed, and we have jurisdiction under A.R.S. § 8-235(A) and Arizona Rule of Procedure for the Juvenile Court 103(A).”
Jeffrey P. v. Department of Child Safety (2016) arizctapp “2 Following trial on November 13, 2014, the superior court granted the motion to terminate both parents’ rights. ¶ 4 Father timely appealed the court’s termination order.”
Aleise H. v. Dcs (2018) arizctapp “This court has jurisdiction over Mother’s timely appeal pursuant to Article 6, Section 9, of the Arizona Constitution, A.R.S. §§ 8-235(A), 12-2101(A) and 12-120.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 8-235(A)(2007) — 1 case
Joslin G. v. Dcs (2014) arizctapp
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 8-235(B) — 8 cases
Roberto F. v. Department of Child Safety (2014) arizctapp “We have jurisdiction pursuant to A.R.S. §§ 8-235(A), 12- 2101(A)(1). ISSUE PRESENTED ¶6 Father asserts the juvenile court lacked jurisdiction3 to enter the order of adoption while his appeal of the termination order was pending.”
Roberto F. v. Department of Child Safety (2015) ariz
Coleman v. Superior Court in & for County of Pima (1974) ariz
Rita J. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security (2000) arizctapp
Katherine S. v. Foreman (1999) arizctapp “A.R.S. § 8-235 (footnotes omitted). ¶ 3 The statute is adopted from section 53 of the Model Juvenile Court Act.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 8-235(B)(2) — 1 case
Katherine S. v. Foreman (1999) arizctapp “A.R.S. § 8-235 (footnotes omitted). ¶ 3 The statute is adopted from section 53 of the Model Juvenile Court Act.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 8-235(C) — 2 cases
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to J.C. (2024) arizctapp
Arlene L. v. Dcs (2014) arizctapp
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.