Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 8-248 (2026)

Hearing; service providers; definition

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

8-248. Hearing; service providers; definition

A. On motion of any party asserting that a child or parent has a statutory or contractual right to receive services from an agency or private service provider, either directly or as a third party beneficiary, a court, after giving notice and an opportunity to be heard, may order the agency or private service provider to appear at a hearing to discuss the child or parent’s service plan.

B. If the child or parent is eligible to receive behavioral health services with title XIX or XXI of the social security act monies, the court may order the agency or private service provider to provide only those behavioral health services that the agency or private service provider determines to be medically necessary covered services.

C. This section does not prohibit the agency or private service provider that has received notice of the hearing from meeting with the parent or child's representative before the hearing to coordinate services.

D. For the purposes of this section, "private service provider" means any individual or entity that receives federal, state or local government funding or reimbursement for providing services directly to a child who is adjudicated a ward of the court.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases, 1975–2011 · leading case: In Re the Appeal in Maricopa Cnty., Juv. Action No. JT-295003, 616 P.2d 84 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1980).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

In Re the Appeal in Maricopa Cnty., Juv. Action No. JT-295003, 616 P.2d 84 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1980). · cites it 5× “The Court stated that it was proceeding pursuant to A.R.S. § 8-248 and Rules 33.1 and *411 33.”

MARIO W. v. Kaipio, 265 P.3d 389 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 4× “¶ 73 Finally, the view that the DNA sampling required by A.R.S. § 8-248 is analogous to fingerprinting because it is just another, more accurate way to ascertain a juvenile's identity ignores what is really going on here.”

Katherine S. v. Foreman, 4 P.3d 426 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 2× “] § 8-248 2 to *375 enforce any treatment, counseling, education or other restraining or protective order that applies to: 1.”

In Re the Appeal in Yavapai Cnty., Juv. Action No. 7707, 543 P.2d 1154 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1975). “§ 8-201 *400 to § 8-248) and the Rules of Procedure for Juvenile Courts, and within the Juvenile Rules themselves, is of some moment.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.