A. The victim may submit a written impact statement or make an oral impact statement to the probation officer for the officer's use in preparing a predisposition or transfer report.
B. In preparing the predisposition or transfer report, the probation officer shall consider the economic, physical and psychological impact that the delinquent act has had on the victim and the victim's immediate family.
C. On request, the probation department shall provide the victim with the following information from the predisposition report:
1. The referral history.
2. The probation officer's assessment of the case.
3. The disposition and treatment recommendations.
4. The probation officer's recommendations for treatment and disposition.
5. The detention history.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
3
cases, 1990–1995 · leading case:
J.D.S. v. Franks, 893 P.2d 732 (Ariz. 1995).
J.D.S. v. Franks, 893 P.2d 732 (Ariz. 1995).
· cites it 2× “131; see also AR.S. §§ 8-404 & 8-405. Conclusion Both Arizona and Florida complied with the requirements of the ICPC, and the Florida court exercised jurisdiction in substantial conformity with the UCCJA.”
Rouzaud v. Marek, 802 P.2d 1074 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1990).
· cites it 6× “After reviewing the record in this case we conclude that personal jurisdiction over Marek was obtained through Rouzaud’s compliance with the express directions of the trial court, pursuant to A.R.S. § 8-404, regarding how to accomplish service.”
Ledoux v. Aldridge, 841 S.W.2d 793 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992).
“Missouri and that Philip Aldridge has had notice and an opportunity to be heard within the meaning of A.R.S. § 8-404; [[Image here]] 21. That this guardianship order shall be given binding force and res judicata effect as to all parties who have appeared herein pursuant to A.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.