A. Subject to the provisions of section 8-514.01, the division or a licensed child welfare agency if so authorized in its license may place a child in a licensed foster home for care or for adoption. Notwithstanding any law to the contrary, the division or a licensed child welfare agency may place a child in excess of the number of children allowed and identified in a foster parent's license if the division or agency reasonably believes the foster home has the ability to safely handle additional children, there are no outstanding concerns, deficiencies, reports or investigations known by the division regarding the foster home, and the child meets any of the following criteria:
1. The child is part of a sibling group that currently resides in the foster home.
2. The child is part of a sibling group that is being considered for placement in a foster home but because of the maximum child limit would otherwise have to be separated.
3. The child previously resided in the foster home.
4. The child is a kinship placement for the foster home.
B. The department shall place a child in the least restrictive type of placement available, consistent with the best interests of the child. The order for placement preference is as follows:
1. With a parent.
2. With a grandparent.
3. In kinship care with another member of the child's extended family, including a person who has a significant relationship with the child. A foster parent or kinship caregiver with whom a child under three years of age has resided for nine months or more is presumed to be a person who has a significant relationship with the child.
4. In licensed family foster care.
5. In therapeutic foster care.
6. In a group home.
7. In a residential treatment facility.
C. Notwithstanding subsection B of this section, the order for placement preference of a Native American child is as follows:
1. With a member of the child's extended family.
2. In a licensed family foster home approved or specified by the child's tribe.
3. In an Indian foster home licensed or approved by an authorized non-Indian licensing authority.
4. In an institution approved by the Indian tribe or operated by an Indian organization that has a program suitable to meet the Indian child's needs pursuant to 25 United States Code chapter 21.
D. At the time of placement there shall be presented to the foster parents, by the agency or division placing the child, a written summary of known, unprivileged information regarding the child, including the following:
1. Demographic information.
2. Type of custody and previous placement.
3. Pertinent family information including but not limited to the names of family members who, by court order, may not visit the child.
4. Known or available medical history including but not limited to:
(a) Allergies.
(b) Immunizations.
(c) Childhood diseases.
(d) Physical disabilities.
(e) Other idiosyncrasies.
(f) The child's last doctor, if known.
5. A summary of the child's history of adjudication on acts of delinquency, as may be public record and available in the file of the clerk of the superior court.
E. The responsibility of the agency or the division for a child placed in a foster home shall be defined in writing and accepted by the person receiving the child. The agency or division shall make available to the foster parents a method of acquiring emergency information that may be necessary to deal with situations that may arise pursuant to their responsibilities as foster parents.
F. Every foster home shall maintain a record of the children received, which shall include facts in regard to the children and their care and shall be in the form and kept in the manner prescribed by the division.
G. In addition to any other relevant factors, the department shall consider the following in determining whether a placement is in the best interests of the child:
1. The caregiver is interested in providing permanence for the child if reunification efforts ultimately fail.
2. The expressed wishes of the birth parent and child, if applicable, unless the wishes are contrary to law.
3. The relationship of the caregiver with the child and the child's family.
4. The proximity of the placement home to the parents' home and the child's current school or school district.
5. The strengths and parenting style of the caregiver in relation to the child's behavior and needs.
6. The caregiver's willingness to communicate and interact with the birth family to support visitation and the reunification process.
7. The caregiver's ability and willingness to accept placement of the child and all or any of the child's siblings.
8. If any sibling will be placed separately, the caregiver's ability and willingness to provide or assist in maintaining frequent visitation or other ongoing contact between the child and the child's sibling.
9. The child's fit with the family with regard to age, gender and sibling relationships.
10. If the child has chronic behavioral health needs:
(a) Whether the child's behavior will place other children in the home at risk.
(b) The caregiver's ability to provide the necessary level of supervision to prevent harm to the child or others by the child.
11. Whether placement in the home would comply with the placement preferences prescribed by 25 United States Code section 1915, if applicable.
H. Within thirty days after a dependent child who is at least eight years of age is placed in out-of-home care, unless otherwise recommended by a doctor or therapist, the department shall ensure that the child receives age-appropriate and developmentally appropriate materials and resources about sexual abuse, child sex trafficking and exploitation. The materials and resources must include a definition of sexual abuse, information about the dangers of online and in-person predators and methods for reporting abuse. The materials and resources may include a twenty-four-hour hotline telephone number.
Notes of Decisions
Jeff D. v. Dep't of Child Saf., 367 P.3d 109 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016).
· cites it 35× “§ 8-514(A) (1982); see also A.R.S. § 8-514 (1970) (same), A.R.S. § 8-514(A) (1971) (same), A.”
Antonio P. v. Arizona Dep't of Econ. Sec., 187 P.3d 1115 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2008).
· cites it 7× “CONCLUSION ¶ 16 Because A.R.S. § 8-514 does not require Anna to be placed with her grandmother over her aunt and uncle, it was within the juvenile court’s discretion to place Anna with her aunt and uncle consistent with Anna’s needs and in her best interests.”
Alexander M. v. Hon. abrams/ades, 328 P.3d 1045 (Ariz. 2014).
· cites it 12× “¶ 5 Despite those findings and the Children’s objections, the juvenile court found AR.S. §§ 8-514 and 8-514.02 “controlling” and ordered that ADES had the “discretion *106 for transition and placement of the [C]hil-dren with their parents” because the court had “confidence that…”
Arizona Dep't of Econ. Sec. v. Leonardo, 22 P.3d 513 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2001).
· cites it 2× “See generally A.R.S. § 8-514 (ADES or a licensed child welfare agency may place a child in a licensed foster home for care or for adoption).”
Antonio M. v. Arizona Dep't of Econ. Sec., 214 P.3d 1010 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009).
· cites it 2× “On appeal, he first contends the juvenile court erred in finding it was in Daniel’s best interests to continue his placement with and adoption by his foster parents, in light of the “statutory preferences” set forth in AR.S. § 8-514(B) that a child be placed with a family member.”
Tinsley v. McKay, 156 F. Supp. 3d 1024 (D. Ariz. 2015).
· cites it 4× “See A.R.S. § 8-514 (“[DCS] or a licensed child welfare agency if so authorized in its license may place a child in a licensed foster home for care or for adoption.”
Lorenz v. State, 364 P.3d 475 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2015).
· cites it 4× “¶ 15 A.R.S. § 8-514(B), for example, directs DCS to place a dependent child “in the least restrictive type of placement available, consistent with the needs of the child,” and it lists placement preferences, in order, as: (1) parents; (2) grandparents; (3) kinship care *559 with…”
Jewel C. v. Dep't of Child Saf., 418 P.3d 1120 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2018).
· cites it 5× “" ¶ 7 A great-grandparent, or other third party, may, however, petition for placement under certain circumstances, pursuant to A.”
Perla M. v. Dcs (Ariz. Ct. App. 2020).
· cites it 8× “¶8 On June 18, 2020 we issued an order: (1) treating the direct appeal as a special action, (2) accepting special action jurisdiction, (3) granting relief, (4) vacating the order for change in physical custody issued December 12, 2019, (5) remanding the matter to allow the…”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 8-514(A) — 3 cases
Jeff D. v. Dep't of Child Saf., 367 P.3d 109 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016).
“§ 8-514(A) (1982); see also A.R.S. § 8-514 (1970) (same), A.R.S. § 8-514(A) (1971) (same), A.”
Alexander M. v. Hon. abrams/ades, 328 P.3d 1045 (Ariz. 2014).
“¶ 5 Despite those findings and the Children’s objections, the juvenile court found AR.S. §§ 8-514 and 8-514.02 “controlling” and ordered that ADES had the “discretion *106 for transition and placement of the [C]hil-dren with their parents” because the court had “confidence that…”
Tinsley v. McKay, 156 F. Supp. 3d 1024 (D. Ariz. 2015).
“See A.R.S. § 8-514 (“[DCS] or a licensed child welfare agency if so authorized in its license may place a child in a licensed foster home for care or for adoption.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 8-514(B) — 18 cases
Jeff D. v. Dep't of Child Saf., 367 P.3d 109 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016).
“§ 8-514(A) (1982); see also A.R.S. § 8-514 (1970) (same), A.R.S. § 8-514(A) (1971) (same), A.”
Antonio P. v. Arizona Dep't of Econ. Sec., 187 P.3d 1115 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2008).
“CONCLUSION ¶ 16 Because A.R.S. § 8-514 does not require Anna to be placed with her grandmother over her aunt and uncle, it was within the juvenile court’s discretion to place Anna with her aunt and uncle consistent with Anna’s needs and in her best interests.”
Antonio M. v. Arizona Dep't of Econ. Sec., 214 P.3d 1010 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009).
“On appeal, he first contends the juvenile court erred in finding it was in Daniel’s best interests to continue his placement with and adoption by his foster parents, in light of the “statutory preferences” set forth in AR.S. § 8-514(B) that a child be placed with a family member.”
Lorenz v. State, 364 P.3d 475 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2015).
“¶ 15 A.R.S. § 8-514(B), for example, directs DCS to place a dependent child “in the least restrictive type of placement available, consistent with the needs of the child,” and it lists placement preferences, in order, as: (1) parents; (2) grandparents; (3) kinship care *559 with…”
Jewel C. v. Dep't of Child Saf., 418 P.3d 1120 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2018).
“" ¶ 7 A great-grandparent, or other third party, may, however, petition for placement under certain circumstances, pursuant to A.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 8-514(B)(1) — 2 cases
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 8-514(B)(2) — 5 cases
Jeff D. v. Dep't of Child Saf., 367 P.3d 109 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016).
“§ 8-514(A) (1982); see also A.R.S. § 8-514 (1970) (same), A.R.S. § 8-514(A) (1971) (same), A.”
Jewel C. v. Dep't of Child Saf., 418 P.3d 1120 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2018).
“" ¶ 7 A great-grandparent, or other third party, may, however, petition for placement under certain circumstances, pursuant to A.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 8-514(B)(3) — 2 cases
Jeff D. v. Dep't of Child Saf., 367 P.3d 109 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016).
“§ 8-514(A) (1982); see also A.R.S. § 8-514 (1970) (same), A.R.S. § 8-514(A) (1971) (same), A.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 8-514(B)(l) — 2 cases
Jeff D. v. Dep't of Child Saf., 367 P.3d 109 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016).
“§ 8-514(A) (1982); see also A.R.S. § 8-514 (1970) (same), A.R.S. § 8-514(A) (1971) (same), A.”
Antonio P. v. Arizona Dep't of Econ. Sec., 187 P.3d 1115 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2008).
“CONCLUSION ¶ 16 Because A.R.S. § 8-514 does not require Anna to be placed with her grandmother over her aunt and uncle, it was within the juvenile court’s discretion to place Anna with her aunt and uncle consistent with Anna’s needs and in her best interests.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 8-514(b) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.