Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 9-204 (2026)

Officers in cities and towns of six hundred to eight hundred fifty voters; terms of office; elections; removal

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. In all cities or towns not organized under article 3 or 4 of this chapter, in which at the next preceding municipal election not more than eight hundred fifty nor less than six hundred votes were cast, the only officers shall be a mayor, four councilmen, a chief of police, a recorder who is also ex officio city auditor and police judge, and a treasurer.

B. The term of office of each officer, except councilmen, is two years. Each councilman shall hold office for a term of four years. The recorder shall be elected as other city or town officers.

C. Elections shall be held on the third Tuesday in May of each odd-numbered year at which all officers whose terms have then expired shall be elected.

D. The mayor and common council may remove an officer for malfeasance in office.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1977–1994 · leading case: Valley Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Flagstaff Dairy, 570 P.2d 200 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1977).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Valley Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Flagstaff Dairy, 570 P.2d 200 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1977). · cites it 4× “3, § 5), (1962 UCC, § 9-204) provides, with an exception not pertinent here, that “.”

Rex Fin. Corp. v. Mobile Am. Corp., 580 P.2d 8 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1978). “The parties also acknowledge that in order for a security interest to have attached under the Fraze security agreement, value had to have been given and the Frazes had to have rights in the collateral, the mobile home.”

Wollenberg v. Phoenix Leasing Inc., 893 P.2d 4 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1994). “UCC § 9-204(1). *9 See generally 2 James J. White and Robert S.”

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 9-204(1) — 1 case

Wollenberg v. Phoenix Leasing Inc., 893 P.2d 4 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1994). “UCC § 9-204(1). *9 See generally 2 James J. White and Robert S.”

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 9-204(3) — 1 case

Valley Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Flagstaff Dairy, 570 P.2d 200 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1977). “3, § 5), (1962 UCC, § 9-204) provides, with an exception not pertinent here, that “.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.