Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 9
Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 9-302 (2026)

Bonds of officers

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. Unless bonded pursuant to the provisions of subsection B of this section, every officer of a city or town shall execute and file an official bond, enforceable against the principal and his sureties, conditioned on the due and faithful performance of his official duties, payable to the state and to and for the use and benefit of the municipality or any person who may be injured or aggrieved by the wrongful act or default of the officer in his official capacity. A person injured or aggrieved may bring suit on such bond under the provisions of section 38-260.

B. Any incorporated city or town may obtain and deliver to the city or town clerk a blanket bond conditioned on faithful performance of all such city's or town's officers payable to the municipality, except the treasurer or tax collector by whatever title known, who shall execute the official bond provided for in subsection A.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1981–1994 · leading case: Black, Robertshaw, Frederick, Copple & Wright, P. C . v. United States, 634 P.2d 398 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1981).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Black, Robertshaw, Frederick, Copple & Wright, P. C . v. United States, 634 P.2d 398 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1981). · cites it 10× “§ 9-302), as amended, required the Law Firm to file a financing statement since, inferentially, the assignments constituted a significant part of Regal’s outstanding accounts.”
Sears Consum. Fin. Corp. v. Thunderbird Prods., 802 P.2d 1032 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1990). · cites it 2× “§ 9-302(2) (perfected security interest remains perfected after assignment); U.”
First Nat. Bank of Arizona v. Carbajal, 645 P.2d 778 (Ariz. 1982). “§ 9-302(3)(b) ]. Arizona has such a central filing system, but neither First National nor Baja complied with the detailed filing and registration provisions of Arizona’s Motor Vehicle Registration Code.”
Wollenberg v. Phoenix Leasing Inc., 893 P.2d 4 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1994). “UCC § 9-302(1). In this case, Sunrise Security signed a security agreement containing a description of collateral including customer accounts, Phoenix Leasing gave value for the security interest in the form of loans, and Sunrise Security had rights in its own customer accounts…”
First Nat. Bank of Arizona v. Carbajal, 645 P.2d 830 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1981). · cites it 2× “§ 9-302(3)); A.R.S. § 28-325. At all times pertinent to the legal issues involved in this litigation, First National was unaware that Carbajal had retained the van’s certificate of title or that the bank’s security interest had not been perfected by Arizona Imports in accordance…”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 9-302(1) — 1 case
Wollenberg v. Phoenix Leasing Inc., 893 P.2d 4 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1994). “UCC § 9-302(1). In this case, Sunrise Security signed a security agreement containing a description of collateral including customer accounts, Phoenix Leasing gave value for the security interest in the form of loans, and Sunrise Security had rights in its own customer accounts…”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 9-302(2) — 1 case
Sears Consum. Fin. Corp. v. Thunderbird Prods., 802 P.2d 1032 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1990). “§ 9-302(2) (perfected security interest remains perfected after assignment); U.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 9-302(3) — 1 case
First Nat. Bank of Arizona v. Carbajal, 645 P.2d 830 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1981). “§ 9-302(3)); A.R.S. § 28-325. At all times pertinent to the legal issues involved in this litigation, First National was unaware that Carbajal had retained the van’s certificate of title or that the bank’s security interest had not been perfected by Arizona Imports in accordance…”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 9-302(3)(b) — 1 case
First Nat. Bank of Arizona v. Carbajal, 645 P.2d 778 (Ariz. 1982). “§ 9-302(3)(b) ]. Arizona has such a central filing system, but neither First National nor Baja complied with the detailed filing and registration provisions of Arizona’s Motor Vehicle Registration Code.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 9-302(l)(d) — 1 case
Sears Consum. Fin. Corp. v. Thunderbird Prods., 802 P.2d 1032 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1990). “§ 9-302(2) (perfected security interest remains perfected after assignment); U.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 9-302(l)(e) — 1 case
Black, Robertshaw, Frederick, Copple & Wright, P. C . v. United States, 634 P.2d 398 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1981). “§ 9-302), as amended, required the Law Firm to file a financing statement since, inferentially, the assignments constituted a significant part of Regal’s outstanding accounts.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.