Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 9-462.04 (2026)

Public hearing required; definition

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

9-462.04. Public hearing required; definition

A. If the municipality has a planning commission or a hearing officer, the planning commission or hearing officer shall hold a public hearing on any zoning ordinance. Notice of the time and place of the hearing, including a general explanation of the matter to be considered and a general description of the area affected, shall be given at least fifteen days before the hearing in the following manner:

1. The notice shall be published at least once in a newspaper of general circulation published or circulated in the municipality, or if there is none, it shall be posted on the affected property in such a manner as to be legible from the public right-of-way and in at least ten public places in the municipality. A posted notice shall be printed so that the following are visible from a distance of one hundred feet: the word "zoning", the present zoning district classification, the proposed zoning district classification and the date and time of the hearing.

2. In proceedings involving rezoning of land that abuts other municipalities or unincorporated areas of the county or a combination of a municipality and an unincorporated area, copies of the notice of public hearing shall be transmitted to the planning agency of the governmental unit abutting such land. In proceedings involving rezoning of land that is located within the territor1y in the vicinity of a military airport or ancillary military facility as defined in section 28-8461 or within the influence area of a military installation or range or Arizona national guard site, the municipality shall send copies of the notice of public hearing by first class mail to the military airport or military installation or range or Arizona national guard site. In addition to notice by publication, a municipality may give notice of the hearing in any other manner that the municipality deems necessary or desirable. For the purposes of this paragraph, "influence area" and "military installation or range or Arizona national guard site" have the same meanings prescribed in section 9-500.50.

3. In proceedings that are not initiated by the property owner involving rezoning of land that may change the zoning classification, notice by first class mail shall be sent to each real property owner, as shown on the last assessment of the property, of the area to be rezoned and all property owners, as shown on the last assessment of the property, within three hundred feet of the property to be rezoned.

4. In proceedings involving one or more of the following proposed changes or related series of changes in the standards governing land uses, notice shall be provided in the manner prescribed by paragraph 5 of this subsection:

(a) A ten percent or more increase or decrease in the number of square feet or units that may be developed.

(b) A ten percent or more increase or reduction in the allowable height of buildings.

(d) A ten percent or more increase or decrease in setback or open space requirements.

(e) An increase or reduction in permitted uses.

5. In proceedings governed by paragraph 4 of this subsection, the municipality shall provide notice to real property owners pursuant to at least one of the following notification procedures:

(a) Notice shall be sent by first class mail to each real property owner, as shown on the last assessment, whose real property is directly governed by the changes.

(b) If the municipality issues utility bills or other mass mailings that periodically include notices or other informational or advertising materials, the municipality shall include notice of the changes with such utility bills or other mailings.

(c) The municipality shall publish the changes before the first hearing on such changes in a newspaper of general circulation in the municipality. The changes shall be published in a "display ad" covering not less than one-eighth of a full page.

6. If notice is provided pursuant to paragraph 5, subdivision (b) or (c) of this subsection, the municipality shall also send notice by first class mail to persons who register their names and addresses with the municipality as being interested in receiving such notice. The municipality may charge a fee not to exceed $5 per year for providing this service and may adopt procedures to implement this paragraph.

7. Notwithstanding the notice requirements in paragraph 4 of this subsection, the failure of any person or entity to receive notice does not constitute grounds for any court to invalidate the actions of a municipality for which the notice was given.

B. If the matter to be considered applies to territory in a high noise or accident potential zone as defined in section 28-8461, the notice prescribed in subsection A of this section shall include a general statement that the matter applies to property located in the high noise or accident potential zone.

C. After the hearing, the planning commission or hearing officer shall render a decision in the form of a written recommendation to the governing body. The recommendation shall include the reasons for the recommendation and be transmitted to the governing body in the form and manner prescribed by the governing body.

D. If the planning commission or hearing officer has held a public hearing, the governing body may adopt the recommendations of the planning commission or hearing officer without holding a second public hearing if there is no objection, request for public hearing or other protest. The governing body shall hold a public hearing if requested by the party aggrieved or any member of the public or of the governing body, or, in any case, if a public hearing has not been held by the planning commission or hearing officer. The governing body may consider the testimony of any party aggrieved when making its decision. In municipalities with territory in the vicinity of a military airport or ancillary military facility as defined in section 28-8461, the governing body shall hold a public hearing if, after notice is transmitted to the military airport pursuant to subsection A of this section and before the public hearing, the military airport provides comments or analysis concerning the compatibility of the proposed rezoning with the high noise or accident potential generated by military airport or ancillary military facility operations that may have an adverse impact on public health and safety, and the governing body shall consider and analyze the comments or analysis before making a final determination. Notice of the time and place of the hearing shall be given in the time and manner provided for giving notice of the hearing by the planning commission as specified in subsection A of this section. A municipality may give additional notice of the hearing in any other manner as the municipality deems necessary or desirable. For the purposes of this subsection, "party aggrieved" means any property owner within the notification area prescribed by subsection A, paragraph 3 of this section.

E. A municipality may enact an ordinance authorizing county zoning to continue in effect until municipal zoning is applied to land previously zoned by the county and annexed by the municipality, but not longer than six months after the annexation.

F. A municipality is not required to adopt a general plan before the adoption of a zoning ordinance.

G. If there is no planning commission or hearing officer, the governing body of the municipality shall perform the functions assigned to the planning commission or hearing officer.

H. If the owners of twenty percent or more of the property by area and number of lots, tracts and condominium units within the zoning area of the affected property, excluding government-owned property, file a protest in writing against a proposed amendment, the change shall not become effective except by the favorable vote of three-fourths of all members of the governing body of the municipality. If any members of the governing body are unable to vote on such a question because of a conflict of interest, then the required number of votes for passage of the question shall be three-fourths of the remaining membership of the governing body, if such required number of votes is not less than a majority of the full membership of the legally established governing body. For the purposes of this subsection, the vote shall be rounded to the nearest whole number. A protest filed pursuant to this subsection shall be signed by the property owners, excluding government-owned property, opposing the proposed amendment and filed in the office of the clerk of the municipality not later than 12:00 noon one business day before the date on which the governing body will vote on the proposed amendment or on an earlier time and date established by the governing body.

I. In applying an open space element or a growth element of a general plan, a parcel of land shall not be rezoned for open space, recreation, conservation or agriculture unless the owner of the land consents to the rezoning in writing.

J. Notwithstanding section 19-142, subsection B, a decision by the governing body involving rezoning of land that is not owned by the municipality and that changes the zoning classification of such land may not be enacted as an emergency measure and the change shall not be effective for at least thirty days after final approval of the change in classification by the governing body.

K. For the purposes of this section, "zoning area" means both of the following:

1. The area within one hundred fifty feet, including all rights-of-way, of the affected property subject to the proposed amendment or change.

2. The area of the proposed amendment or change.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 17 cases, 1975–2016 · leading case: Blanchard v. Show Low Plan. & Zoning Comm'n, 993 P.2d 1078 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1999).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Blanchard v. Show Low Plan. & Zoning Comm'n, 993 P.2d 1078 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 27× “See A.R.S. § 9-462.04. This hearing, too, was televised on the local cable channel.”

Schwarz v. City of Glendale, 950 P.2d 167 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 15× “03 provides: A zoning ordinance which changes any property from one zone to another, imposes any regulation not previously imposed or which removes or modifies any such regulation previously imposed shall be adopted in the manner set forth in § 9-462.04. (Emphasis added.)…”

Specht v. City of Page, 627 P.2d 1091 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1981). · cites it 19× “Count Three of appellees’ complaint sought to invalidate the City’s Ordinance Number 7, the City’s entire zoning ordinance, on grounds of improper adoption due to lack of sufficient notice as required by A.R.S. § 9-462.04. The City of Page is a municipal corporation located in…”

Libra Grp., Inc. v. State, 805 P.2d 409 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 2× “Arizona law limits local authorities’ *180 exercise of their zoning power in specific instances when it imposes statewide requirements, such as due process hearing requirements, A.”

Croaff v. Evans, 636 P.2d 131 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1981). · cites it 8× “§ 11-829 C plaintiff cites A.R.S. § 9-462.04 G, a part of the statutory scheme authorizing the enactment of zoning ordinances by cities and towns.”

Mobile Cmty. Council for Progress, Inc. v. Brock, 119 P.3d 463 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 2× “Additionally, Mobile also claims that the trial court’s interpretation of § 11-824(C) would render portions of § 11-829(D) “superfluous, void and insignificant.”

Levitz v. State, 613 P.2d 1259 (Ariz. 1980). · cites it 2× “The City readily admits that the revised sign ordinance in question was not enacted in accordance with the statutory requirements of the Urban Environment Management Act, A.”

Transamerica Title Ins. Co. Trust Nos. 8295, 8297, 8298, 8299, 8300 & 8301 v. City of Tucson, 757 P.2d 1055 (Ariz. 1988). · cites it 2× “For example, A.R.S. § 9-462.04 requires notice and a public hearing where a city zoning ordinance is to be adopted which changes any property from one zone to another, imposes any regulation not previously imposed or which removes or modifies any such regulation previously…”

Folsom Investments, Inc. v. City of Scottsdale, 620 F. Supp. 1372 (D. Ariz. 1985). · cites it 4× “If a municipality decides to regulate land use, it must comply with Ariz.Rev.Stat.Ann. § 9-462.04 which requires certain procedures such as a hearing before the planning commission, notice of hearing by publication or posting 15 days before the hearing, etc.”

Lane v. City of Phoenix, 816 P.2d 934 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 3× “The board shall fix a reasonable time for hearing the appeal, and shall give notice of hearing by both publication in a newspaper of general circulation in accordance with § 9-462.04 and posting the notice in conspicuous places close to the property affected.”

Haines v. City of Phoenix, 727 P.2d 339 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 2× “Furthermore, pursuant to A.R.S. § 9-462.04(E), a municipality is not required to adopt a general plan prior to the adoption of a zoning ordinance.”

Stagecoach Trails MHC, L.L.C. v. City of Benson, 278 P.3d 314 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 3× “In August, the court granted summary judgment in favor of Stagecoach Trails, finding § 16 had been enacted without strict adherence to the notice requirements of § 9-462.04 and was therefore void. ¶ 9 On September 14, Stagecoach Trails filed a supplemental special-action…”

Show all 17 citing cases →

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 9-462.04(A) — 1 case

Specht v. City of Page, 627 P.2d 1091 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1981). “Count Three of appellees’ complaint sought to invalidate the City’s Ordinance Number 7, the City’s entire zoning ordinance, on grounds of improper adoption due to lack of sufficient notice as required by A.R.S. § 9-462.04. The City of Page is a municipal corporation located in…”

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 9-462.04(A)(2) — 1 case

Blanchard v. Show Low Plan. & Zoning Comm'n, 993 P.2d 1078 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1999). “See A.R.S. § 9-462.04. This hearing, too, was televised on the local cable channel.”

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 9-462.04(A)(3) — 1 case

Blanchard v. Show Low Plan. & Zoning Comm'n, 993 P.2d 1078 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1999). “See A.R.S. § 9-462.04. This hearing, too, was televised on the local cable channel.”

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 9-462.04(A)(4) — 1 case

Stagecoach Trails MHC, L.L.C. v. City of Benson, 278 P.3d 314 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2012). “In August, the court granted summary judgment in favor of Stagecoach Trails, finding § 16 had been enacted without strict adherence to the notice requirements of § 9-462.04 and was therefore void. ¶ 9 On September 14, Stagecoach Trails filed a supplemental special-action…”

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 9-462.04(B) — 1 case

Lane v. City of Phoenix, 816 P.2d 934 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1991). “The board shall fix a reasonable time for hearing the appeal, and shall give notice of hearing by both publication in a newspaper of general circulation in accordance with § 9-462.04 and posting the notice in conspicuous places close to the property affected.”

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 9-462.04(C) — 1 case

Ripps v. City of Tucson, 736 P.2d 827 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1987).

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 9-462.04(E) — 1 case

Haines v. City of Phoenix, 727 P.2d 339 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1986). “Furthermore, pursuant to A.R.S. § 9-462.04(E), a municipality is not required to adopt a general plan prior to the adoption of a zoning ordinance.”

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 9-462.04(G) — 3 cases

Schwarz v. City of Glendale, 950 P.2d 167 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1997). “03 provides: A zoning ordinance which changes any property from one zone to another, imposes any regulation not previously imposed or which removes or modifies any such regulation previously imposed shall be adopted in the manner set forth in § 9-462.04. (Emphasis added.)…”

Mobile Cmty. Council for Progress, Inc. v. Brock, 119 P.3d 463 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2005). “Additionally, Mobile also claims that the trial court’s interpretation of § 11-824(C) would render portions of § 11-829(D) “superfluous, void and insignificant.”

Ripps v. City of Tucson, 736 P.2d 827 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1987).

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 9-462.04(H) — 1 case

Blanchard v. Show Low Plan. & Zoning Comm'n, 993 P.2d 1078 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1999). “See A.R.S. § 9-462.04. This hearing, too, was televised on the local cable channel.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.