Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 9-499.10 (2026)

Infill incentive districts

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

9-499.10. Infill incentive districts

A. The governing body of a city or town may designate an infill incentive district in an area in the city or town that meets at least three of the following requirements:

1. There is a large number of vacant older or dilapidated buildings or structures.

2. There is a large number of vacant or underused parcels of property, obsolete or inappropriate lot or parcel sizes or environmentally contaminated sites.

3. There is a large number of buildings or other places where nuisances exist or occur.

4. There is an absence of development and investment activity compared to other areas in the city or town.

5. There is a high occurrence of crime.

6. There is a continuing decline in population.

B. If the governing body establishes an infill incentive district, it shall adopt an infill incentive plan to encourage redevelopment in the district. The plan may include:

1. Expedited zoning or rezoning procedures.

2. Expedited processing of plans and proposals.

3. Waivers of municipal fees for development activities as long as the waivers are not funded by other development fees.

4. Relief from development standards.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 2007–2007 · leading case: HOME BUILDERS ASS'N v. City of Maricopa, 158 P.3d 869 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2007).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

HOME BUILDERS ASS'N v. City of Maricopa, 158 P.3d 869 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2007). “But § 9-499.10(B)(3) provides, “[i]f the governing body establishes an infill incentive district, it shall adopt an infill incentive plan to encourage redevelopment in the district.”

Home Builders Ass'n v. City of Maricopa (Ariz. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 3× “¶26 Finally, Maricopa argues the trial court’s interpretation of § 11-1101 renders A.R.S. § 9-499.10(B)(3) meaningless. But § 9-499.”

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 9-499.10(B)(3) — 2 cases

Home Builders Ass'n v. City of Maricopa (Ariz. Ct. App. 2007). “¶26 Finally, Maricopa argues the trial court’s interpretation of § 11-1101 renders A.R.S. § 9-499.10(B)(3) meaningless. But § 9-499.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.