Arkansas Code Annotated

Ark. Code Ann. § 12-12-1102 (2026)

Purpose

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaArk. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The General Assembly finds and declares that:

  1. DNA data banks are an important tool in:
    1. Criminal investigations;
    2. The exclusion of individuals who are the subjects of criminal investigations or prosecutions; and
    3. Deterring and detecting recidivist acts;
  2. Several states have enacted laws requiring persons convicted of certain crimes, especially sexual offenses, to provide genetic samples for DNA profiling;
  3. Moreover, it is the policy of this state to assist federal, state, and local criminal justice and law enforcement agencies in the identification and detection of individuals in criminal investigations; and
  4. It is therefore in the best interest of the State of Arkansas to establish a DNA data base and a DNA data bank containing DNA samples submitted by individuals convicted of sex offenses and violent offenses.

History. Acts 1997, No. 737, § 2.

Case Notes

Evidence.

Unlike the situation in a prior case, the state presented proof that defendant's un-degraded DNA was on a ski mask, found with a pair of gloves, 129 feet from the back door of the house where the rape occurred, and the victim testified that the attacker wore a ski mask and gloves, and that the mask and gloves shown to the victim by police looked like the ones the victim saw on the victim's attacker, and in conjunction with defendant's inconsistent defense theories, the evidence was sufficient to sustain defendant's conviction. Haynes v. State, 354 Ark. 514, 127 S.W.3d 456 (2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 1047, 124 S. Ct. 2168, 158 L. Ed. 2d 740 (2004).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2003–2013 · leading case: Haynes v. State, 127 S.W.3d 456 (Ark. 2003).
Haynes v. State, 127 S.W.3d 456 (Ark. 2003). · cites it 4× “Ark. Code Ann. § 12-12-1102 (Repl.1999). The original Act provided that a person who was adjudicated guilty "for a sex offense, a violent offense, or a repeat offense on or after August 1, 1997, shall have a deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) sample drawn," either upon incarceration…”
Polston v. State, 201 S.W.3d 406 (Ark. 2005). · cites it 2× “See Ark. Code Ann. § 12-12-1102 (1), (3) (Repl.”
Slocum v. State, 2013 Ark. 406 (Ark. 2013). · cites it 2× “See Ark. Code Ann. § 12-12-1102 (1)(3). In 2003, the General Assembly renamed the Act the “State Convicted Offender DNA Data Base Act,” see Ark.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.