Arkansas Code Annotated
Ark. Code Ann. § 16-114-204 (2026)
[Repealed.]
✓ current as of May 2026
Publisher's Notes. This section, concerning notice of intent to sue, was repealed by Acts 1995, No. 1296, § 63. The section was derived from Acts 1979, No. 709, § 5; A.S.A. 1947, § 34-2617; Acts 1991, No. 346, § 1.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 17
cases, 1988–1997 · leading case: Weidrick v. Arnold, 835 S.W.2d 843 (Ark. 1992).
Weidrick v. Arnold, 835 S.W.2d 843 (Ark. 1992). “The single point on appeal is whether Rule 3 of our Rules of Civil Procedure regarding commencement of actions superseded this statutory provision.”
Pugh v. Griggs, 940 S.W.2d 445 (Ark. 1997). “On September 24, 1990, Appellees served the medical defendants with notice of intent to sue, pursuant to Ark.Code Ann. § 16-114-204 (1987) (repealed 1995).”
Ruffins v. Er Arkansas, Pa, 853 S.W.2d 877 (Ark. 1993). “The plaintiff responded that she filed suit for wrongful death within the three-year limitation period and did not have to comply with the notice provisions of the Medical Malpractice Act, contained in Ark.”
Thomas v. Cornell, 872 S.W.2d 370 (Ark. 1994). “Appellants, Lorraine and Calvin Thomas, urge us to reverse the trial court's findings in this regard inasmuch as Ark.Code Ann. § 16-114-204 authorizes a ninety-day extension of this limitations period under circumstances relating to their claim.”
Parmley v. Moose, 876 S.W.2d 243 (Ark. 1994). “2d 843 (1992), a medical malpractice case, in relation to Ark. Code Ann. § 16-114-204 (Supp. 1993)(“Notice of intent to sue”)- In the present case, the trial court correctly dismissed appellant Nora Parmley’s medical malpractice action with prejudice, ruling that the statute was…”
Baker v. Milam, 900 S.W.2d 209 (Ark. 1995). “See Ark. Code Ann. § 16-114-204 (a) (Supp. 1993).”
Pugh v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins., 877 S.W.2d 577 (Ark. 1994). “On September 24, 1990, she served appellees with notice of intent to sue, a prerequisite for a medical malpractice action under Ark. Code Ann. § 16-114-204 (1987). On November 24, 1990, she refiled the complaint.”
Thompson v. Dunn, 889 S.W.2d 31 (Ark. 1994). “On June 25, 1993, Thompson forwarded notice of his claim for medical injury, pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. § 16-114-204 (Supp. 1993), to appellees Dr.”
Cox v. Bard, 786 S.W.2d 570 (Ark. 1990). “The issue presented by this appeal is whether the requirement for commencement of a medical malpractice action pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. § 16-114-204 (a) (1987) is satisfied by a sheriff serving the doctor with notice of intent to sue.”
Brown v. St. Paul Mercury Ins., 823 S.W.2d 908 (Ark. 1992). “See Ark. Code Ann. § 16-114-204 (1987). The appellants then asked for a voluntary dismissal under Ark.”
Ofili v. Osco Drug, Inc., 780 S.W.2d 11 (Ark. 1989). “The issue presented by this case is whether the notice of intent to sue on an action for medical injury (contained in Ark. Code Ann. § 16-114-204 (1987)) is required to be served by certified or registered mail pursuant to the statute.”
Morrison v. Jennings, 943 S.W.2d 559 (Ark. 1997). “"Because this is a wrongful death action, compliance with the medical malpractice statutes, including § 16-114-204, is irrelevant. The doctrine of law of the case clearly applies.”
— Ark. Code Ann. § 16-114-204(a) — 7 cases
Baker v. Milam, 900 S.W.2d 209 (Ark. 1995). “See Ark. Code Ann. § 16-114-204 (a) (Supp. 1993).”
Cox v. Bard, 786 S.W.2d 570 (Ark. 1990). “The issue presented by this appeal is whether the requirement for commencement of a medical malpractice action pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. § 16-114-204 (a) (1987) is satisfied by a sheriff serving the doctor with notice of intent to sue.”
Weidrick v. Arnold, 835 S.W.2d 843 (Ark. 1992). “The single point on appeal is whether Rule 3 of our Rules of Civil Procedure regarding commencement of actions superseded this statutory provision.”
Pugh v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins., 877 S.W.2d 577 (Ark. 1994). “On September 24, 1990, she served appellees with notice of intent to sue, a prerequisite for a medical malpractice action under Ark. Code Ann. § 16-114-204 (1987). On November 24, 1990, she refiled the complaint.”
Lambert Ex Rel. Brown v. Beverly Enter., Inc., 753 F. Supp. 267 (W.D. Ark. 1990).
— Ark. Code Ann. § 16-114-204(b) — 6 cases
Pugh v. Griggs, 940 S.W.2d 445 (Ark. 1997). “On September 24, 1990, Appellees served the medical defendants with notice of intent to sue, pursuant to Ark.Code Ann. § 16-114-204 (1987) (repealed 1995).”
Baker v. Milam, 900 S.W.2d 209 (Ark. 1995). “See Ark. Code Ann. § 16-114-204 (a) (Supp. 1993).”
Pugh v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins., 877 S.W.2d 577 (Ark. 1994). “On September 24, 1990, she served appellees with notice of intent to sue, a prerequisite for a medical malpractice action under Ark. Code Ann. § 16-114-204 (1987). On November 24, 1990, she refiled the complaint.”
Weidrick v. Arnold, 835 S.W.2d 843 (Ark. 1992). “The single point on appeal is whether Rule 3 of our Rules of Civil Procedure regarding commencement of actions superseded this statutory provision.”
Thompson v. Dunn, 889 S.W.2d 31 (Ark. 1994). “On June 25, 1993, Thompson forwarded notice of his claim for medical injury, pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. § 16-114-204 (Supp. 1993), to appellees Dr.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.