Publisher's Notes.
This section, concerning transfer of cases between circuit and chancery courts, was repealed by Acts 2003, No. 1185, § 85. The section was derived from Acts 1885, No. 106, § 12, p. 171; 1891, No. 156, § 9, p. 266; 1893, No. 9, § 9, p. 12; 1897 (Ex. Sess.), No. 37, § 9, p. 90; C. & M. Dig., § 2185; Pope's Dig., § 2794; A.S.A. 1947, § 22-405.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
5
cases, 1988–1995 · leading case:
Linder v. Howard, 757 S.W.2d 549 (Ark. 1988).
Linder v. Howard, 757 S.W.2d 549 (Ark. 1988).
· cites it 8× “On February 25, 1987, the chancellor transferred the case to circuit courtpresumably pursuant to the provisions of Ark. Code Ann. §§ 16-13-401 and 16-57-104(a) (1987).”
J.W. Reynolds Lumber Co. v. Smackover State Bank, 836 S.W.2d 853 (Ark. 1992).
· cites it 3× “It is clear that no fact was stated in support of subject matter jurisdiction in the Chancery Court; nor was any evidence of a fact which would have established a constructive or resulting trust offered or even argued.”
State v. J.B., 827 S.W.2d 144 (Ark. 1992).
· cites it 2× “See Ark. Code Ann. § 16-13-401 (1987); Ark. R.”
Est. of Puddy v. Gillam, 785 S.W.2d 254 (Ark. Ct. App. 1990).
· cites it 2× “See Ark. Code Ann. § 16-13-401 (1987). We therefore reverse and remand with directions to transfer this suit against the appellee to circuit court.”
Bonnell v. Smith, 908 S.W.2d 74 (Ark. 1995).
· cites it 2× “Ark. Code Ann. § 16-13-401 (Repl. 1994); Ark.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.