Arkansas Code Annotated
Ark. Code Ann. § 16-13-401 (2026)
[Repealed.]
✓ current as of May 2026
Publisher's Notes. This section, concerning transfer of cases between circuit and chancery courts, was repealed by Acts 2003, No. 1185, § 85. The section was derived from Acts 1885, No. 106, § 12, p. 171; 1891, No. 156, § 9, p. 266; 1893, No. 9, § 9, p. 12; 1897 (Ex. Sess.), No. 37, § 9, p. 90; C. & M. Dig., § 2185; Pope's Dig., § 2794; A.S.A. 1947, § 22-405.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1988–1995 · leading case: Linder by & Through Linder v. Howard, 757 S.W.2d 549 (Ark. 1988).
Linder by & Through Linder v. Howard, 757 S.W.2d 549 (Ark. 1988). “On February 25, 1987, the chancellor transferred the case to circuit courtpresumably pursuant to the provisions of Ark. Code Ann. §§ 16-13-401 and 16-57-104(a) (1987).”
J.W. Reynolds Lumber Co. v. Smackover State Bank, 836 S.W.2d 853 (Ark. 1992). “It is clear that no fact was stated in support of subject matter jurisdiction in the Chancery Court; nor was any evidence of a fact which would have established a constructive or resulting trust offered or even argued.”
State v. J.B., 827 S.W.2d 144 (Ark. 1992). “See Ark. Code Ann. § 16-13-401 (1987); Ark. R.”
Est. of Puddy v. Gillam, 785 S.W.2d 254 (Ark. Ct. App. 1990). “See Ark. Code Ann. § 16-13-401 (1987). We therefore reverse and remand with directions to transfer this suit against the appellee to circuit court.”
Bonnell v. Smith, 908 S.W.2d 74 (Ark. 1995). “Ark. Code Ann. § 16-13-401 (Repl. 1994); Ark.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.