Arkansas Code Annotated

Ark. Code Ann. § 16-96-505 (2026)

[Superseded.]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaArk. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Publisher's Notes. This section was superseded by former Arkansas Inferior Court Rule 9. See Bocksnick v. City of London, 308 Ark. 599, 825 S.W.2d 267 (1992); see now Ark. R. Crim. P. 36. The section was derived from Acts 1905, No. 151, § 2, p. 375; C. & M. Dig., § 3383; Pope's Dig., § 4226; A.S.A. 1947, § 44-505.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1992–2006 · leading case: Ottens v. State, 871 S.W.2d 329 (Ark. 1994).
Ottens v. State, 871 S.W.2d 329 (Ark. 1994). · cites it 8× “Appellant argues that Ark. Code Ann. § 16-96-505 (1987) places the burden of filing the record on the municipal court official.”
Bocksnick v. City of London, 825 S.W.2d 267 (Ark. 1992). · cites it 2× “See Ark. Code Ann. § 16-96-505 (1987). That statute, however, has clearly been superseded by Rule 9(a) of the Inferior Court Rules, and we so hold.”
Hawkins v. City of Prairie Grove, 871 S.W.2d 357 (Ark. 1994). · cites it 2× “2d 267 (citing Ark. Code Ann. § 16-96-505 (1987)). However, section 16-17-213 has been superseded by Rule 9 of the Inferior Court Rules, and we so hold.”
In re Adoption of Rule 36 of the Arkansas Rules of Crim. Procedure, 366 Ark. 619 (Ark. 2006). · cites it 3× “Ark. Code Ann. § 16-96-505 , which describes the transcript in a criminal case, was not included in this subsection because § 16-96-505 is shown as superseded by the Code Revision Commission.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.