Arkansas Code Annotated

Ark. Code Ann. § 17-81-101 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaArk. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This chapter shall be known as the “Arkansas Chiropractic Practices Act”.

History. Acts 1971, No. 706, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 72-415.

Case Notes

Cited: Teston v. Ark. State Bd. of Chiropractic Examiners, 361 Ark. 300, 206 S.W.3d 796.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 2005–2005 · leading case: Teston v. Arkansas State Bd. of Chiropractic Examiners, 206 S.W.3d 796 (Ark. 2005).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Teston v. Arkansas State Bd. of Chiropractic Examiners, 206 S.W.3d 796 (Ark. 2005). · cites it 2× “Teston argues first that there was no substantial evidence that he was subject to the Arkansas Chiropractic Practices Act, see Ark. Code Ann. § 17-81-101 et seq. (Repl.”

Teston v. Ark. State Bd. of Chirop. Exam., 206 S.W.3d 796 (Ark. 2005). · cites it 2× “§ 17-93-101 et seq. (Repl.2002). We begin with an examination of the relevant statutes.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.