Arkansas Code Annotated
Ark. Code Ann. § 19-11-201 (2026)
Title
✓ current as of May 2026
This subchapter shall be referred to as the “Arkansas Procurement Law”.
History. Acts 1979, No. 482, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 14-233; Acts 2001, No. 1237, § 1.
Publisher's Notes. Acts 1979, No. 482, § 7, provided that this subchapter applies only to contracts solicited or entered into after July 1, 1979, unless the parties agree to its applicability to a contract entered into prior to this date.
Case Notes
Cited: Milligan v. Burrow, 52 Ark. App. 20, 914 S.W.2d 763 (1996).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1995–2004 · leading case: Nat'l Park Med. Ctr., Inc. v. Arkansas Dep't of Human Servs., 911 S.W.2d 250 (Ark. 1995).
Nat'l Park Med. Ctr., Inc. v. Arkansas Dep't of Human Servs., 911 S.W.2d 250 (Ark. 1995). “APA issue With respect to the APA issue, the trial court ruled that, in developing the bid solicitation and awarding the provider contract, appellees followed state contracting procedures according to the Arkansas Purchasing Law, Ark. Code Ann. § 19-11-201 to -261 (Repl.”
Pine Bluff Nat'l Bank v. St. Paul Mercury Ins., 346 F. Supp. 2d 1020 (E.D. Ark. 2004). “Paul argues, the Bank would have suffered the same losses even if the signatures on the falsified leases had been authentic because the persons whose names were signed as representatives of the different state agencies did not have the authority to bind the state agencies since…”
Milligan v. Burrow, 914 S.W.2d 763 (Ark. Ct. App. 1996). “Bown replied by letter to Milligan and stated that SBS was not bound by the bidding process set forth in the Arkansas Purchasing Law ( Ark. Code Ann. §§ 19-11-201 — 19-11-261 (Repl.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.