Arkansas Code Annotated

Ark. Code Ann. § 2-4-107 (2026)

Operation not to become nuisance

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaArk. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
  1. An agricultural operation or its facilities or appurtenances shall not be or become a public or private nuisance as a result of any changed conditions in and about the locality after it has been in operation for a period of one (1) year or more when the agricultural operation or its facilities or appurtenances were not a nuisance at the time the agricultural operation began.
    1. Except as provided in this section, an agricultural operation shall not be found to be a public or private nuisance if the agricultural operation alleged to be a nuisance employs methods or practices that are commonly or reasonably associated with agricultural production.
    2. An agricultural operation that employs methods or practices that are commonly or reasonably associated with agricultural production shall not be found to be a public or private nuisance as a result of any of the following activities or conditions:
      1. Change in ownership or size;
      2. Nonpermanent cessation or interruption of farming;
      3. Participation in any government-sponsored agricultural program;
      4. Employment of new technology; or
      5. Change in the type of agricultural product produced.
    1. Notwithstanding any other provision of this section to the contrary, an agricultural operation shall not be found to be a public or private nuisance if the agricultural operation:
      1. Was established before the commencement of the use of the area surrounding the agricultural operation for nonagricultural activities; and
      2. Employs methods or practices that are commonly or reasonably associated with agricultural production.
    2. Employment of methods or practices that are commonly or reasonably associated with agricultural production or are in compliance with any state or federally issued permit shall create a rebuttable presumption that an agricultural operation is not a nuisance.
  2. The court may award expert fees, reasonable court costs, and reasonable attorney's fees to the prevailing party in any action brought to assert that an agricultural operation is a public or private nuisance.

History. Acts 1981, No. 301, § 3; A.S.A. 1947, § 34-122; Acts 2005, No. 2257, § 5.

Amendments. The 2005 amendment substituted, in (a), “operation or its facilities or appurtenances” for “facility, its appurtenances, or the operation thereof” and “agricultural operation or its facilities or appurtenances were” for “facility, its appurtenances, or the operation thereof was”; and added (b)-(d).

Research References

U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev.

Kristin Titley, Note: Environmental Law—Regulation of Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations—Reducing the Nuisance: How Arkansas Can Use Its Right-to-Farm Statute to Protect Against the Destruction of CAFOs, 37 U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 495 (2015).

Notes of Decisions
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.