Ark. Code Ann. » Title 23 Chapter 18
Arkansas Code Annotated

Ark. Code Ann. § 23-18-501 (2026)

Title

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaArk. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This subchapter shall be known and may be cited as the “Utility Facility Environmental and Economic Protection Act”.

History. Acts 1973, No. 164, § 1; 1977, No. 866, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-276.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1988–2011 · leading case: Hempstead Cnty. Hunting Club, Inc. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 324 S.W.3d 697 (Ark. Ct. App. 2009).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Hempstead Cnty. Hunting Club, Inc. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 324 S.W.3d 697 (Ark. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 2× “Soon thereafter, SWEPCO filed three separate applications pursuant to the Utility Facility Environmental and Economic Protection Act, Arkansas Code Annotated sections 23-18-501 to -530 (Repl.2002 and Supp.”
Hempstead Cnty. Hunting Club, Inc. v. Sw. Elec. Power Co., 385 S.W.3d 123 (Ark. 2011). · cites it 2× “First, it alleges that the Utility Facility and Economic Protection Act, Ark.Code Ann. §§ 23-18-501 to - 530 (Repl.”
Arkansas Charcoal Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 773 S.W.2d 427 (Ark. 1989). · cites it 2× “mission (PSC) for an order directing TXO to appear and show cause why it should not be prohibited from providing gas service to ACC until (1) it complied with Arkansas law and regulations for public utilities and (2) obtained a Certificate of Environmental Compatibility and…”
Arkansas Charcoal Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 762 S.W.2d 403 (Ark. Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 6× “Section 23-18-501 et seq. (1987), and why it should not be prohibited from selling natural gas to ACC.”
Hempstead Cnty. Hunting Club, Inc. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 384 S.W.3d 477 (Ark. 2010). “Thereafter, SWEPCO filed three separate applications pursuant to the Utility Facility and Economic Protection Act, Arkansas Code Am notated sections 23-18-501 to -530 (Repl. 2002 & Supp.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.