Arkansas Code Annotated

Ark. Code Ann. § 23-64-510 (2026)

Assumed names

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaArk. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

An insurance producer doing business under any name other than the producer's legal name is required to notify the Insurance Commissioner prior to using the assumed name.

History. Acts 2001, No. 580, § 1.

Case Notes

Violation.

There was substantial evidence to support the revocation of the license of a title insurance company owner because there was a longtime pattern of poor record-keeping, poor management, and questionable business practices that enabled the owner's employee to commit fraud; and the owner disregarded the sanctity of escrow accounts and failed to place correct information on title policies regarding his license, business name, and the required statutory notices. Moreover, the sanction was not too harsh because revocation was an available sanction for the violations that occurred. Dyer v. Ark. Ins. Dep't, 2015 Ark. App. 446, 468 S.W.3d 303 (2015).

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 2015–2015 · leading case: Dyer v. Arkansas Ins. Dep't, 2015 Ark. App. 446 (Ark. Ct. App. 2015).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Dyer v. Arkansas Ins. Dep't, 2015 Ark. App. 446 (Ark. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 2× “See Ark.Code Ann. § 23-64-510 (Repl. 2012), and § 23-103-413(2) (Repl.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.