Ark. Code Ann. » Title 24 Chapter 04
Arkansas Code Annotated

Ark. Code Ann. § 24-4-750 (2026)

Arkansas District Judge Retirement System abolished — Powers, duties, and plan liabilities transferred to Arkansas Public Employees' Retirement System

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaArk. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
  1. The Arkansas District Judge Retirement System, established by § 24-8-801 et seq. [repealed], is abolished, and its powers, duties, and plan liabilities are transferred to the Arkansas Public Employees' Retirement System by a type 3 transfer as prescribed in § 25-2-106.
  2. For purposes of this act, the Arkansas Public Employees' Retirement System shall be considered a principal department established by Acts 1971, No. 38.
    1. The Arkansas Public Employees' Retirement System shall maintain the same process of payments under § 24-4-751.
    2. Active members of the Arkansas District Judge Retirement System on the date of the transfer shall continue to accrue the same program of benefits received before the transfer.
    3. As employer, the government entity that pays the salary of a district judge shall make contributions to the Arkansas Public Employees' Retirement System as a percent of the salary of the active district judge at the rate previously established to fund the district judge benefit program unless the Arkansas Public Employees' Retirement System's actuary determines that a different required contribution rate should be applied.
  4. Each district judge joining the Arkansas Public Employees' Retirement System after the date of transfer shall be deemed an elected official of a city or county and shall receive service credit under § 24-4-101(15)(B).

History. Acts 2007, No. 177, § 1.

Meaning of “this act”. Acts 2007, No. 177, codified as §§ 16-10-307, 16-10-308, 16-17-135, 19-4-1107, 24-2-401, 24-2-402, 24-2-502, 24-4-750, 24-4-751, 24-8-318, 24-8-807, 24-8-902, and 24-8-904.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2019–2022 · leading case: Linda Bolding v. Arkansas Pub. Employees Ret. Sys. Arkansas Pub. Employees Ret. Sys. Bd. Candace Franks, in Her Off. & Individual Capacity Larry Walther, in His Off. & Individual Capacity David Hudson, in His Off. & Individual Capacity Steve Faris, in His Off. & Individual Capacity Daryl Bassett, in His Off. & Individual Capacity Gary Carnahan, in His Off. & Individual Capacity Joe Hurst, in His Off. & Individual Capacity Andrea Lea, in Her Off. & Individual Capacity Dennis Milligan, in His Off. & Individual Capacity & Duncan Baird, in His Off. & Individual Capacity, 2022 Ark. App. 275 (Ark. Ct. App. 2022).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Linda Bolding v. Arkansas Pub. Employees Ret. Sys. Arkansas Pub. Employees Ret. Sys. Bd. Candace Franks, in Her Off. & Individual Capacity Larry Walther, in His Off. & Individual Capacity David Hudson, in His Off. & Individual Capacity Steve Faris, in His Off. & Individual Capacity Daryl Bassett, in His Off. & Individual Capacity Gary Carnahan, in His Off. & Individual Capacity Joe Hurst, in His Off. & Individual Capacity Andrea Lea, in Her Off. & Individual Capacity Dennis Milligan, in His Off. & Individual Capacity & Duncan Baird, in His Off. & Individual Capacity, 2022 Ark. App. 275 (Ark. Ct. App. 2022). “§ 24-4-750 (Repl. 2014), ADJRS was abolished July 1, 2007, but Bolding continued to receive her same monthly retirement benefits from APERS without interruption.”
Carter v. Military Dep't of Arkansas (E.D. Ark. 2019). “§ 25-38-204 , § 25-18-103, § 24-4-750, and there is no statute transferring ADEM under the authority of AMD.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.