Arkansas Code Annotated

Ark. Code Ann. § 25-16-206 (2026)

[Repealed.]

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaArk. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Publisher's Notes. This section, concerning the Division of Volunteerism, was repealed by Acts 1993, No. 403, § 19. A former similar section was derived from Acts 1977, No. 865, §§ 1-4; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 12-322 — 12-325; Acts 1989, No. 143, § 1; 1989, No. 186, § 1. For present law see § 25-10-128.

Subchapter 3 — Lieutenant Governor

Effective Dates. Acts 1953, No. 219, § 6: Mar. 5, 1953. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and declared by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that the services of an administrative assistant are essential to the operation of the Lieutenant Governor's office; therefore this act being necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety, an emergency is declared to exist, and this act shall take effect and be in full force from and after its approval.”

Research References

ALR.

Validity, construction, and effect of state statutes restricting political activities of public officers or employees. 51 A.L.R.4th 702.

C.J.S. 81A C.J.S., States, § 131.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 2005–2005 · leading case: Teston v. Arkansas State Bd. of Chiropractic Examiners, 206 S.W.3d 796 (Ark. 2005).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Teston v. Arkansas State Bd. of Chiropractic Examiners, 206 S.W.3d 796 (Ark. 2005). · cites it 2× “During the pendency of the Chiropractic Board’s investigation of Teston, Teston sought a declaratory order from the Arkansas State Board of Physical Therapy (“the Physical Therapy Board”) pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. § 25-16-206 (Repl. 2002). After reviewing Fryar’s and Hendrix’s…”

Teston v. Ark. State Bd. of Chirop. Exam., 206 S.W.3d 796 (Ark. 2005). · cites it 2× “During the pendency of the Chiropractic Board's investigation of Teston, Teston sought a declaratory order from the Arkansas State Board of Physical Therapy ("the Physical Therapy Board") pursuant to Ark.Code Ann. § 25-16-206 (Repl.2002). After reviewing Fryar's and Hendrix's…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.