Arkansas Code Annotated

Ark. Code Ann. § 4-29-101 (2026)

Persons associated with professional corporations — Limitations on personal liability

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaArk. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
  1. No person shall be personally liable for any obligation or liability of any shareholder, director, officer, agent, or employee of a professional corporation solely because the person is a shareholder, director, officer, agent, or employee of the professional corporation.
  2. In addition, no person shall be personally liable for any obligations or liabilities of a professional corporation solely because the person is a shareholder, director, officer, agent, or employee of the professional corporation.

History. Acts 1991, No. 1146, § 1.

Subchapter 2 — Arkansas Professional Corporation Act

Effective Dates. Acts 1963, No. 155, § 20: Mar. 5, 1963. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby determined that it is expedient immediately to amend the corporation laws of this State, in order to provide necessary correlation between them and the practice of professions, in corporate form, so that adequate regulation, safeguards, and supervision may be provided for the public peace, health, safety and welfare. An emergency is therefore declared to exist and this act being necessary therefor, the same shall be effective from and after its passage and approval.”

Research References

ALR.

Statute prohibiting use of name descriptive of engineering by business organization not practicing profession of engineering. 13 A.L.R.4th 676.

Liability of professional corporation of lawyers, or individual members thereof, for malpractice or other tort of another member. 39 A.L.R.4th 556.

U. Ark. Little Rock L.J.

Mathews, Corporate Statutes—Which One Applies?, 13 U. Ark. Little Rock L.J. 82.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1998–1998 · leading case: Sturgis v. Skokos, 977 S.W.2d 217 (Ark. 1998).
Sturgis v. Skokos, 977 S.W.2d 217 (Ark. 1998). · cites it 3× “Ark. Code Ann. § 4-29-101 (Repl. 1996). In view of our conclusions that the claims against Mr.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.