Arkansas Code Annotated

Ark. Code Ann. § 4-4A-108 (2026)

Relationship to Electronic Fund Transfer Act

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaArk. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
  1. Except as provided in subsection (b), this chapter does not apply to a funds transfer any part of which is governed by the Electronic Fund Transfer Act of 1978 (Title XX, Public Law 95-630, 92 Stat. 3728, 15 U.S.C. § 1693 et seq.) as amended from time to time.
  2. This chapter applies to a funds transfer that is a remittance transfer as defined in the Electronic Fund Transfer Act (15 U.S.C. § 1693 et seq.) as amended from time to time, unless the remittance transfer is an electronic fund transfer as defined in the Electronic Fund Transfer Act (15 U.S.C. § 1693a) as amended from time to time.
  3. In a funds transfer to which this chapter applies, in the event of an inconsistency between an applicable provision of this chapter and an applicable provision of the Electronic Fund Transfer Act, the provision of the Electronic Fund Transfer Act governs to the extent of the inconsistency.

History. Acts 1991, No. 540, § 1; 2013, No. 111, § 1.

Amendments. The 2013 amendment rewrote the section heading and the section.

Research References

ALR.

Validity, Construction, and Application of Electronic Fund Transfer Act (EFTA), and Regulations Promulgated Thereunder, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1693 et seq.46 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 473.

Case Notes

Applicability.

In an action arising out of a state-chartered bank's practices regarding the order in which debit card transactions were posted to maximize overdraft fees, the bank's argument that UCC Article 4A approved of high-to-low posting based on, in particular, processing of payment orders, failed because debit card transactions were within the scope of the Electronic Fund Transfer Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1693a(7), and therefore expressly outside the scope of UCC Article 4A. Hanjy v. Arvest Bank, 94 F. Supp. 3d 1012 (E.D. Ark. 2015).

Part 2 — Issue and Acceptance of Payment Order

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2003–2015 · leading case: Hanjy v. Arvest Bank, 94 F. Supp. 3d 1012 (E.D. Ark. 2015).
Hanjy v. Arvest Bank, 94 F. Supp. 3d 1012 (E.D. Ark. 2015). · cites it 2× “” Ark.Code Ann. § 4-4A-108(a); Mo. Ann. Stat.”
Mercantile Bank of Arkansas v. Vowell, 117 S.W.3d 603 (Ark. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 2× “Indeed, Ark.Code Ann. § 4-4A-108 (Repl.2001), "Exclusion of consumer transactions governed by federal law," provides: This chapter [Chapter 4] does not apply to a funds transfer any part of which is governed by the Electronic Fund Transfer Act of 1978 (Title XX, Public Law…”
— Ark. Code Ann. § 4-4A-108(a) — 1 case
Hanjy v. Arvest Bank, 94 F. Supp. 3d 1012 (E.D. Ark. 2015). “” Ark.Code Ann. § 4-4A-108(a); Mo. Ann. Stat.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.