Arkansas Code Annotated

Ark. Code Ann. § 7-6-221 (2026)

[Repealed.]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaArk. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Publisher's Notes. This section, concerning the independent expenditure disclosure, was repealed by Acts 2001, No. 1839, § 15. The section was derived from Init. Meas. 1996, No. 1, § 9.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1997–1998 · leading case: Arkansas Right to Life State Political Action Comm. v. Butler, 983 F. Supp. 1209 (W.D. Ark. 1997).
Arkansas Right to Life State Political Action Comm. v. Butler, 983 F. Supp. 1209 (W.D. Ark. 1997). · cites it 20× “Defendants point out in their brief that Ark.Code § 7-6-221 is more narrowly drawn than the Ohio statute in McIntyre and only compels disclosure of an expenditure that “expressly advocates the election or defeat of a clearly identified candidate for office.”
Arkansas Right to Life State Political Action Comm. v. Butler, 29 F. Supp. 2d 540 (W.D. Ark. 1998). · cites it 9× “As stated above, an independent expenditure is any expenditure which is not a contribution and “expressly advocates the election or defeat of a clearly identified candidate for office” and is made without any cooperation between the candidate and the person making the…”
— Ark. Code Ann. § 7-6-221(a) — 2 cases
Arkansas Right to Life State Political Action Comm. v. Butler, 29 F. Supp. 2d 540 (W.D. Ark. 1998). “As stated above, an independent expenditure is any expenditure which is not a contribution and “expressly advocates the election or defeat of a clearly identified candidate for office” and is made without any cooperation between the candidate and the person making the…”
Arkansas Right to Life State Political Action Comm. v. Butler, 983 F. Supp. 1209 (W.D. Ark. 1997). “Defendants point out in their brief that Ark.Code § 7-6-221 is more narrowly drawn than the Ohio statute in McIntyre and only compels disclosure of an expenditure that “expressly advocates the election or defeat of a clearly identified candidate for office.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.