Arkansas Code Annotated

Ark. Code Ann. § 7-7-202 (2026)

Preferential and general primaries — When required — Common polling places

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaArk. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
  1. Whenever any political party shall select by primary election party nominees as candidates at any general election for any United States, state, district, county, township, or municipal office, there shall be held a preferential primary election and a general primary election, if required, on the respective dates provided in § 7-7-203(a) and (b).
  2. A general primary election for a political party shall not be held if there are no races in which three (3) or more candidates qualify for the same office or position as provided in subsection (c) of this section unless a general primary election is necessary to break a tie vote for the same office or position at the preferential primary.
  3. If there are no races in which three (3) or more candidates qualify for the same office or position, only the preferential primary election shall be held for the political party. If all nominations have been determined at the preferential primary election or by withdrawal of candidates as provided in § 7-7-304(a) and (b), the general primary election shall not be held.
  4. The county board of election commissioners shall establish common polling places for the joint conduct of the primary elections of all political parties.

History. Acts 1969, No. 465, Art. 1, §§ 8, 10; 1971, No. 261, § 4; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 3-108, 3-110; Acts 1995, No. 901, § 3; 2005, No. 67, § 17; 2009, No. 959, § 35.

Amendments. The 2009 amendment inserted “if required” in (a), and made related changes.

RESEARCH REFERENCES

ALR.

Effect of irregularities or defects in primary petitions—State cases. 14 A.L.R.6th 543.

Case Notes

Constitutionality.

Neither Ark. Const. Amend. 29, § 5, nor this section, which establish and implement the majority vote primary run-off requirement, violate the Fourteenth or Fifteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution or the federal Voting Rights Act. Whitfield v. Democratic Party, 686 F. Supp. 1365 (E.D. Ark. 1988), aff'd in part, reversed in part, 890 F.2d 1423 (8th Cir. 1989).

There is no substantial reason to believe that the majority-vote requirement in this state was originally enacted to prevent black political success. Jeffers v. Clinton, 740 F. Supp. 585 (E.D. Ark. 1990), appeal dismissed, 498 U.S. 1129, 111 S. Ct. 1096, 112 L. Ed. 2d 1200 (1991).

Section 5 of Amendment 29 and its implementing statutes were not enacted nor maintained for racially invidious purposes. Jeffers v. Clinton, 740 F. Supp. 585 (E.D. Ark. 1990), appeal dismissed, 498 U.S. 1129, 111 S. Ct. 1096, 112 L. Ed. 2d 1200 (1991).

Right to Contest.

As a matter of public policy, former similar section gave a candidate in a preferential primary the right to contest that election upon the proper allegations of entitlement to be certified as a candidate in the run-off or general primary election. Porter v. Hesselbein, 235 Ark. 379, 360 S.W.2d 499 (1962) (decision under prior law).

Withdrawal of Candidate.

Withdrawal from race of candidate who received second largest number of votes at preferential primary did not give third highest candidate right to have his name placed on ballot for general primary. Higgins v. Barnhill, 218 Ark. 466, 236 S.W.2d 1011 (1951), overruled in part, Nethercutt v. Pulaski County Special School Dist., 248 Ark. 143, 450 S.W.2d 777 (1970) (decision under prior law).

Cited: Republican Party v. Faulkner County, 49 F.3d 1289 (8th Cir. 1995); Citizens to Establish a Reform Party v. Priest, 970 F. Supp. 690 (E.D. Ark. 1996).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1988–1996 · leading case: Whitfield v. Democratic Party of State of Ark., 686 F. Supp. 1365 (E.D. Ark. 1988).
Whitfield v. Democratic Party of State of Ark., 686 F. Supp. 1365 (E.D. Ark. 1988). · cites it 18× “This case involves a challenge to Ark. Code Ann. § 7-7-202 , which requires that a candidate receive a majority of the votes cast in a political party’s primary election in order to obtain the nomination of that political party.”
Jeffers v. Clinton, 740 F. Supp. 585 (E.D. Ark. 1990). · cites it 8× “The statute carrying into effect this constitutional provision is now codified as Ark. Code Ann. § 7-7-202 (1987). In recent years, such majority-vote requirements have become an issue in the context of minority voting rights.”
Citizens to Establish Reform Party v. Priest, 970 F. Supp. 690 (E.D. Ark. 1996). · cites it 2× “Under Arkansas statutory law, established political parties are required to hold their own general primary elections pursuant to Ark.Code Ann. § 7-7-202(a). The Arkansas Election Code also provides that a political party or group may select electors for President or Vice…”
— Ark. Code Ann. § 7-7-202(a) — 2 cases
Citizens to Establish Reform Party v. Priest, 970 F. Supp. 690 (E.D. Ark. 1996). “Under Arkansas statutory law, established political parties are required to hold their own general primary elections pursuant to Ark.Code Ann. § 7-7-202(a). The Arkansas Election Code also provides that a political party or group may select electors for President or Vice…”
Whitfield v. Democratic Party of State of Ark., 686 F. Supp. 1365 (E.D. Ark. 1988). “This case involves a challenge to Ark. Code Ann. § 7-7-202 , which requires that a candidate receive a majority of the votes cast in a political party’s primary election in order to obtain the nomination of that political party.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.