Arkansas Code Annotated

Ark. Code Ann. § 9-11-106 (2026)

Incestuous marriages — Penalties for entering into or solemnizing

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaArk. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
  1. All marriages between parents and children, including grandparents and grandchildren of every degree, between brothers and sisters of the half as well as the whole blood, and between uncles and nieces, and between aunts and nephews, and between first cousins are declared to be incestuous and absolutely void. This section shall extend to illegitimate children and relations.
  2. Whoever contracts marriage in fact, contrary to the prohibitions of subsection (a) of this section, and whoever knowingly solemnizes the marriage shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and shall upon conviction be fined or imprisoned, or both, at the discretion of the jury who shall pass on the case, or if the conviction shall be by confession, or on demurrer, then at the discretion of the court.

History. Rev. Stat., ch. 94, §§ 3, 9; Acts 1875, No. 102, § 1, p. 221; C. & M. Dig., §§ 7038, 7045; Pope's Dig., §§ 9018, 9025; Acts 1973, No. 253, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 55-103, 55-105.

Cross References. Incest, § 5-26-202.

Case Notes

First Cousins.

A marriage between first cousins does not create “much social alarm,” so that the marriage will be recognized if it was valid by the law of the state in which it took place. Etheridge v. Shaddock, 288 Ark. 481, 706 S.W.2d 395 (1986).

Where after divorce and awarding of custody of children to father, he married his first cousin and when they discovered that such marriages were prohibited in Arkansas had such marriage annulled and got married in state permitting such marriages and returned to Arkansas, such remarriage was not a sufficient basis for change of custody. Etheridge v. Shaddock, 288 Ark. 481, 706 S.W.2d 395 (1986).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2008–2008 · leading case: United States v. Dedman, 527 F.3d 577 (6th Cir. 2008).
United States v. Dedman, 527 F.3d 577 (6th Cir. 2008). · cites it 3× “§ 9-11-106, which declared marriage between grandparents and grandchildren “absolutely void” just as the current statute does, and concluding that “[s]uch marriages are not merely voidable, but void ab initio”). Dedman and Holland’s SBP claims made on the basis of a void…”
— Ark. Code Ann. § 9-11-106(a) — 1 case
United States v. Dedman, 527 F.3d 577 (6th Cir. 2008). “§ 9-11-106, which declared marriage between grandparents and grandchildren “absolutely void” just as the current statute does, and concluding that “[s]uch marriages are not merely voidable, but void ab initio”). Dedman and Holland’s SBP claims made on the basis of a void…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.