Sts. Peter & Paul Church v. Reading Anthracite Co., 452 A.2d 1019 (Pa. 1982). · Go Syfert
Search
Sts. Peter & Paul Church v. Reading Anthracite Co., 452 A.2d 1019 (Pa. 1982). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
5 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Behar v. Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (pamd, 2011-03-31)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Behar v. Pennsylvania Department of Transportation
M.D. Penn. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See McKay v. Com., 52 Pa.Cmwlth. 24 , 415 A.2d 910 (Pa. Commw.1980), appeal dismissed 499 Pa. 223 , 452 A.2d 1019 (Pa.1982) (allowing disclosure of information obtained by psychiatrist from operator for purpose of determining operator’s competency to operate motor vehicle did not violate operator’s constitutional right of privacy in light of fact that, though allowing such disclosure constituted an intrusion on operator’s right to privacy, such intrusion was outweighed by public interest in having incompetent drivers removed from highways).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STS. PETER AND PAUL CHURCH OF ST. CLAIR
v.
READING ANTHRACITE COMPANY
Appeal No. 80-3-698.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Dec 10, 1982.
452 A.2d 1019
Chester C. Corse, Jr., Pottsville, for appellant., Thomas F. Traud, Jr., Allentown, Thomas F. Toole, Shenandoah, A.C.F. Kenowski, Scranton, for appellee.
Brien, Consideration, Flaherty, Hutchinson, Larsen, McDermott, Nix, Roberts.
Published

[*223] ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appeal dismissed as having been improvidently granted.

HUTCHINSON, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.