green
Positive treatment
1.9 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "see"
City of Bristol v. Vogelsonger
See Denby v. Voloshin Cadillac, Inc., 3 Conn. App. 181 , 181-82 n.3, 485 A.2d 1360 , cert. dismissed, 196 Conn. 802 , 491 A.2d 1105 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Smith v. Town of Greenwich
See Gurliacci v. Mayer, supra, 218 Conn. 541 n.7 ; Bristol v. Vogelsonger, 21 Conn. App. 600 , 601 n.2, 575 A.2d 252 (1990); Greengarden v. Kuhn, 13 Conn. App. 550, 552 , 537 A.2d 1043 (1988); see also Denby v. Voloshin Cadillac, Inc., 3 Conn. App. 181 , 181-82 n.3, 485 A.2d 1360 , cert. dismissed, 196 Conn. 802 , 491 A.2d 1105 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gurliacci v. Mayer
To hold otherwise would be ‘to depart from this sound policy which allows a decision based on more evidence to preclude review of a decision made on less evidence.’ ” Bristol v. Vogelsonger, 21 Conn. App. 600 , 601 n.2, 575 A.2d 252 (1990), quoting Greengarden v. Kuhn, supra; see also Denby v. Voloshin Cadillac, Inc., 3 Conn. App. 181 , 181-82 n.3, 485 A.2d 1360 , cert. dismissed, 196 Conn. 802 , 491 A.2d 1105 (1985).
Stanley
v.
Tucker v. American Insurance Company
v.
Tucker v. American Insurance Company
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Apr 18, 1985.
Stanley V. Tucker, pro se, in support of the petition., Frederick D. Augenstern, in opposition.
Published
The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 3 Conn. App. 397, is dismissed.