green
Positive treatment
9.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Lankard, C. v. Laurel Mountain
Therefore, th.is Court employs .. the same reasoning as the c ~· . j Superior Court did in McGuire v. Schneider, Inc., 368 Pa, Super. 344, 351 ..53, 534 A.2d 115 , "'a. ~ 119~20 (1987)dilf~ 5 J9 Pa. 439, 548 A.2d 1223 (1988), regarding parolevidence, I .J Instantly, the Plaintiffs want the Court to allow the introduction of'parol evidence g ~ which would specifically contradict the written and executed Contracts (here the Easement ~ i and the SLA).
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Ruffing v. 84 Lumber Co.
(4×)
Id., 519 Pa. at 349, 548 A.2d at 117.
discussed
Cited "see"
ORIGIN, INC. v. MAGID FINANCIAL SERVICES INC.
See id. at 523 (“The presence of an integration clause in a contract is ‘a clear sign that the writing is meant to be [the parties’ entire agreement]’ and ‘make[s] the parol evidence rule particularly applicable.’” (quoting McGuire v. Schneider, Inc., 534 A.2d 115, 117 (Pa. Super. 1987), aff'd, 548 A.2d 1223 (Pa. 1988))).
discussed
Cited "see"
Silvis v. Ambit Energy L.P.
(2×)
See McGuire v. Schneider, Inc., 368 Pa.Super. 344 , 534 A.2d 115, 118 (1987), aff'd, 519 Pa. 439 , 548 A.2d 1223 (1988) (holding that a contract was fully integrated where it stated that it contained the parties’ entire understanding, was not ambiguous, covered the disputed subject matter, and “convey[ed] no suggestion that anything beyond the four corners of the writing [was] necessary in order to ascertain the intent of the parties”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kia v. Imaging Sciences International, Inc.
(2×)
See McGuire v. Schneider, Inc., 368 Pa.Super. 344 , 534 A.2d 115, 118 (1987), aff'd per curiam, 519 Pa. 439 , 548 A.2d 1223 (1988); 3 Williston on Contracts § 7:11 (4lh ed. 2007). 5 .
examined
Cited "see"
1726 Cherry Street Partnership v. Bell Atlantic Properties, Inc.
(4×)
See, inter alia, McGuire v. Schneider, Inc., 368 Pa.Super. 344 , 534 A.2d 115 (1987), aff'd per curiam, 519 Pa. 439 , 548 A.2d 1223 (1988); LeDonne v. Kessler, 256 Pa.Super. 280 , 389 A.2d 1123 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Leroy D. Schoch v. First Fidelity Bancorporation and Industrial Valley Title Insurance Company
(2×)
See McGuire v. Schneider, Inc., 368 Pa.Super. 344, 348-49 , 534 A.2d 115, 117 (1987), aff'd, 519 Pa. 439 , 548 A.2d 1223 (1988) (per curiam); J.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Chateaugay Corp.
(2×)
See, McGuire v. Schneider Inc., 368 Pa.Super. 344 , 534 A.2d 115 (1987), aff'd, 519 Pa. 439 , 548 A.2d 1223 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
LTV Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
(2×)
See, McGuire v. Schneider Inc., 368 Pa.Super. 344 , 534 A.2d 115 (1987), aff'd, 519 Pa. 439 , 548 A.2d 1223 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
CKSJB Holdings, LLC v. Epam Sys., Inc.
(2×)
Pa. Nov. 3, 1997) ("[A]ny argument that the parties intended to be so bound is negated by the parties' written agreement that [defendant] was not obligated to execute a definitive agreement."); see also Brinich v. Jencka , 757 A.2d 388 , 400 (Pa. Super. 2000) (citing McGuire v. Schneider, Inc. , 534 A.2d 115 , 117 (Pa. Super. 1987) ), aff'd , 519 Pa. 439 , 548 A.2d 1223 (1988) ("Where the parties to an agreement adopt a writing as the final and complete expression of their agreement, alleged prior or contemporaneous oral representations or agreements concerning subjects that are specifically d…
Frank McGUIRE, Appellant,
v.
SCHNEIDER, INC.
v.
SCHNEIDER, INC.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Oct 20, 1988.
Nix, C.J., and Larsen, Flaherty, McDermott, Zappala, Papadakos and Stout.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Geoffrey P. Wozman, Martin E. Goldhaber, Mary C. Fairley, Pittsburgh, for appellant.
[*440] Samuel Y. Stroh, Pittsburgh, Raymond H. Bogaty, Grove City, for appellee.
Before NIX, C.J., and LARSEN, FLAHERTY, McDERMOTT, ZAPPALA, PAPADAKOS and STOUT, JJ.
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
Order affirmed.