Kuchinski v. Burns, 582 A.2d 204 (Conn. 1990). · Go Syfert
Kuchinski v. Burns, 582 A.2d 204 (Conn. 1990). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“defendant's sixth amendment right . . . does not include the right to compel a witness to waive his filth amendment privilege”
52 citation events (26 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Nieves (connappct, 2005-06-07)
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991 2008 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) State v. Nieves
Conn. App. Ct. · 2005 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
defendant's sixth amendment right . . . does not include the right to compel a witness to waive his filth amendment privilege
cited Cited "see" State v. Ayuso
Conn. App. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See id.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Rivas
Conn. App. Ct. · 2025 · signal: see also · confidence low
See id., 376 (‘‘[b]ecause the trial court was unaware of this transcript and because it did not contain generally known facts, we will not take judicial notice of it’’); see also Moore v. Commissioner of Correction, 227 Conn. App. 487, 519 , 321 A.3d 470 (declin- ing to take judicial notice of transcripts and court file from underlying criminal case because ‘‘we cannot . . . take judicial notice of materials for the purpose of weighing evidence and inferring facts’’), cert. granted, 350 Conn. 924 , 326 A.3d 247 (2024). 0, 0 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL Page 11 0 Conn. App. 1 ,0 13 S…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Warkentin v. Burns (2×)
Conn. · 1992 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Kuchinski v. Burns, 23 Conn. App. 198 , 579 A.2d 585 , cert. denied, 216 Conn. 826 , 582 A.2d 204 (1990) (rejecting the plaintiffs argument that the ninety day period should run from the date of the appointment of the fiduciary).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Robert B. Kuchinski, Conservator (Estate of Robert P. Kuchinski)
v.
J. William Burns, Commissioner of Transportation
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 23, 1990.
582 A.2d 204
Joseph Biraglia, in support of the petition., Paul E. Pollock, in opposition.
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 60%
Citer courts: Connecticut Appellate Court (1)

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 23 Conn. App. 198, is denied.