State v. Geisler, 597 A.2d 342 (Conn. 1991). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Geisler, 597 A.2d 342 (Conn. 1991). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
63 citation events (16 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: St. George v. Gordon (conn, 2003-07-01)
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "see" St. George v. Gordon
Conn. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
But that is entirely different from the state’s sovereign immunity from suit . . . .” (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Murphy v. Ives, supra, 151 Conn. 264 ; accord Westport Taxi Service, Inc. v. Westport Transit District, 235 Conn. 1, 26 , 664 A.2d 719 (1995); see generally Giannitti v. Stamford, 25 Conn. App. 67, 78-79 , 593 A.2d 140 , cert. denied, 220 Conn. 918 , 597 A.2d 333 (1991).
discussed Cited "see" Pilot's Choice v. E.E. Zimmerman Company, No. 31 60 54 (Sep. 26, 1995)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
Id.; see Felsted v. Kimberly Auto Services Inc., 25 Conn. App. 665 , 666-67 , 596 A.2d 14 , cert. denied, 220 Conn. 922 , 597 A.2d 342 (1991) (denial of leave to amend affirmed where claim is barred by statute of limitations).
discussed Cited "see" Ortiz v. City of Bridgeport, No. Cv93 30 46 43 S (Mar. 17, 1995)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
In a word, `"[i]nstructions should not be so drawn as to direct the attention of the jury too prominently to the facts in the testimony on one side of the case, while sinking out of view, or passing lightly over portions of the testimony on the other side which deserve equal attention."'" Bruneau v. Quick, supra. 187 Conn. 627 -628; see Giannitti v. Stamford, 25 Conn. App. 67 , 73 , 593 A.2d 140 , cert. denied, 220 Conn. 918 , 597 A.2d 333 (1991).
cited Cited "see" Burns v. Board of Education
Conn. App. Ct. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See Giannitti v. Stamford, 25 Conn. App. 67, 79 , 593 A.2d 140 , cert. denied, 220 Conn. 918 , 597 A.2d 333 (1991), and Kolaniak v. Board of Education, 28 Conn. App. 277, 280 , 610 A.2d 193 (1992).
cited Cited "see" State v. Hoeplinger
Conn. App. Ct. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Geisler, 25 Conn. App. 282 , 283-84 n.2, 594 A.2d 985 , cert. denied, 200 Conn. 918 , 597 A.2d 342 (1991).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Cohen v. Yale-New Haven Hospital, No. 365908 (Aug. 31, 2000)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 2000 · signal: see also · confidence low
Instructions should not be so drawn as to direct the attention of the jury too prominently to the facts in the testimony on one side of the case, while sinking out of view, or passing lightly over, portions of the testimony on the other side, which deserve equal attention. . . ." (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Kevin Roche-John Dinkeloo Associates v. New Haven, 205 Conn. 741 , 745-46 , 535 A.2d 1287 (1988); see also Giannitti v. Stamford, 25 Conn. App. 67 , 73-74 , 593 A.2d 140 , cert. denied, 220 Conn. 918 , 597 A.2d 333 (1991).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Cintron
Conn. App. Ct. · 1995 · signal: see also · confidence low
In deciding a motion to view the scene “[t]he court should consider whether viewing the scene is necessary or important so that the jury may clearly understand the issues and properly apply the evidence.” State v. Cato, supra, 21 Conn. App. 410 ; see also Giannitti v. Stamford, 25 Conn. App. 67, 71-72 , 593 A.2d 140 , cert. denied, 220 Conn. 918 , 597 A.2d 333 (1991).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Weiss v. Greenwich Housing Authority, Inc., No. Cv93-0131151 (Jan. 5, 1995)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 1995 · signal: see also · confidence low
Accordingly, the Appellate Court affirmed the directed verdict because "[i]n the absence of such evidence, the jury could not conclude that there was or was not an intention to mislead, or that the defendant was or was not in fact misled by the inaccuracy of the time of the accident as alleged in the notice." Id. ; see also Giannitti v. City of Stamford , 25 Conn. App. 67 , 75-76 , 593 A.2d 140 , Cert. denied 220 Conn. 918 , 597 A.2d 333 (1991) (holding that "[s]ection § 13a-149 contains a savings clause that provides that notice given under the statute will not be invalidated because of inac…
State of Connecticut
v.
Martin Geisler
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 3, 1991.
597 A.2d 342
LeonF. Dadhec, Jr., assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition., Richard Emanuel, assistant public defender, in opposition.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

The state of Connecticut’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 25 Conn. App. 282, is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Was the Appellate Court correct in reversing the trial court’s factual finding that the police reasonably believed that the defendant was in need of emergency assistance, thus rendering entry of the defendant’s home lawful under the emergency doctrine?”