green
Positive treatment
1.8 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Boykin
United States v. Martino, 759 F.2d 998, 1002-1003 (2d Cir. 1985); see State v. Cavanaugh, 23 Conn. App. 667, 674 , 583 A.2d 1311 (1990), cert. denied, 220 Conn. 930 , 598 A.2d 1100 (1991) (coconspirator’s action of immediately going to the defendant and turning over cash from drug deal supports the jury’s conclusion that both persons had agreed to work in concert to sell drugs); see also United States v. Rodriguez, 702 F.2d 38, 41 (2d Cir. 1983) (evidence that the defendant was present at drug scene, spent thirty to forty-five minutes walking up and down the block past vehicles where drug …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Diaz
We also “scrutinize the strategies [actually] employed by each defendant at trial and determine, in light of the trial court’s ongoing duty to monitor the fairness of the joint trial, whether conflict between the defendants tainted the proceeding.” 4 State v. Vinal, 198 Conn. 644, 649 , 504 A.2d 1364 (1986); see also State v. Cavanaugh, 23 Conn. App. 667, 676 , 583 A.2d 1311 (1990), cert. denied, 220 Conn. 930 , 598 A.2d 1100 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Salmond
Accordingly, we now, inter alia, “scrutinize the strategies [actually] employed by each defendant at trial and determine, in light of the trial court’s ongoing duty to monitor the fairness of the joint trial, whether conflict between the defendants tainted the proceeding.” State v. Vinal, 198 Conn. 644, 649 , 504 A.2d 1364 (1986); see also State v. Cavanaugh, 23 Conn. App. 667, 676 , 583 A.2d 1311 (1990) , cert. denied, 220 Conn. 930 , 598 A.2d 1100 (1991) .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State of Connecticut
v.
John Cavanaugh
v.
John Cavanaugh
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 6, 1991.
Temmy Ann Pieszak, assistant public defender, in support of the petition., Rita M. Shair, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 23 Conn. App. 667, is denied.