Schult v. Schult, 675 A.2d 885 (Conn. 1996). · Go Syfert
Schult v. Schult, 675 A.2d 885 (Conn. 1996). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
52 citation events (18 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Pasik v. United Technologies Corp., No. Cv94 31 33 96 S (Aug. 7, 2002) (connsuperct, 2002-08-07)
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Pasik v. United Technologies Corp., No. Cv94 31 33 96 S (Aug. 7, 2002)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Reynolds v. Chrysler First Commercial Corp ., 40 Conn. App. 725 , 730 , 673 A.2d 573 , cert. denied , 237 Conn. 913 , 675 A.2d 885 (1996); Firgeleski v. Hubbell, Inc ., D.N.
discussed Cited "see" Donovan v. Neri, No. Cv97-0140940s (Apr. 24, 2002)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Suarez v. Dickmont Plastics Corp., 229 Conn. 99 , 107 , 639 A.2d 507 (1994). "[S]ummary judgment is ordinarily inappropriate where an individual's intent and state of mind are implicated." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Reynolds v. Chrysler First Commercial Corp., 40 Conn. App. 725 , 731 , 673 A.2d 575 , cert. denied, 237 Conn. 913 , 675 A.2d 885 (1996).
discussed Cited "see" McGuire v. Derby Savings Bank, No. Cv97-0056878s (Apr. 24, 2002)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Suarez v. Dickmont Plastics Corp., 229 Conn. 99 , 107 , 639 A.2d 507 (1994). "[S]ummary judgment is ordinarily inappropriate where an individual's intent and state of mind are implicated." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Reynolds v. Chrysler First Commercial Corp., 40 Conn. App. 725 , 731 , 673 A.2d 575 , cert. denied, 237 Conn. 913 , 675 A.2d 885 (1996).
cited Cited "see" Lord v. Lord
Conn. App. Ct. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See Schult v. Schult, 40 Conn. App. 675 , 687 n.10, 672 A.2d 959 , cert. granted on other grounds, 237 Conn. 912 , 675 A.2d 885 (1996).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Jewett v. General Dynamics Corp., No. 530943 (May 1, 1997)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 1997 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Reynolds v. Chrysler First Commercial Corp., 40 Conn. App. 725 , 673 A.2d 573 , cert. denied, 237 Conn. 913 , 675 A.2d 885 (1996) (where court held that, because plaintiff presented insufficient evidence that defendant impliedly contracted to implement its progressive disciplinary measures with the plaintiff in every situation where the plaintiff allegedly performed his job inadequately, trial court properly granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
CHERYL SCHULT
v.
JEFFREY SCOT SCHULT
SC 15418.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
May 9, 1996.
675 A.2d 885
Elizabeth Gleason, in support of the petition., John J. Bennett and Colette Griffin, in opposition.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

The petition by the guardian ad litem for the minor child for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 40 Conn. App. 675 (AC 13482), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“In an action for dissolution of a marriage, if a child is represented by both a guardian ad litem and an attorney,[*913] does the attorney for the child have the authority to express an opinion on behalf of the child that differs from the opinion of the guardian ad litem?”
The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15418. Elizabeth Gleason, in support of the petition. John J. Bennett and Colette Griffin, in opposition. Decided May 9, 1996