State v. Romero, 684 A.2d 710 (Conn. 1996). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Romero, 684 A.2d 710 (Conn. 1996). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
43 citation events (13 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Kusy v. Norwich (connappct, 2019-08-27)
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Kusy v. Norwich
Conn. App. Ct. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
See id., 544–45, 545 n.1.3 Despite our decision in Beach, the plaintiff relies on Koloniak v. Board of Education, 28 Conn. App. 277 , 281–82, 610 A.2d 193 (1992), for the proposition that the act of removing snow and ice is ministerial in nature.
discussed Cited "see" Caruso v. Board of Education for Milford, No. Cv99 06 79 57 (Dec. 10, 2001)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Beach v. Regional School District Number 13, 42 Conn. App. 542 , 554 , 682 A.2d 118 , cert. denied, 239 Conn. 939 , 684 A.2d 710 (1996). 8 In that the court has found that the actions of the Milford board of education were discretionary, the board would ordinarily be immune from liability unless the action fell within an exception to the rule that a municipal employee may not be held liable for his discretionary acts.
discussed Cited "see" Trantolo v. State, No. Cv 97-0569475s (Jun. 8, 1999)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Srager v. Koenig , 42 Conn. App. 617 , 619 , 681 A.2d 323 , cert. denied, CT Page 7083 239 Conn. 935 , 684 A.2d 709 (1996) (discussing imposition of sanctions because plaintiff failed to timely file an appellant's brief after receiving five extensions); Olshefski v. Stenner , Superior Court, judicial district of Hartford-New Britain at Hartford, Docket No. 351899 (September 27, 1990, Clark, J.) ( 2 Conn. L.
discussed Cited "see" Gooden v. Thomas, No. Cv95 032 28 49 (Jan. 28, 1998)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 1998 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord Beach v. Regional School District Number 13, 42 Conn. App. 542 , 553 , 682 A.2d 118 , cert. denied, 239 Conn. 939 , 684 A.2d 710 (1996) (determination of whether official acts or omissions are ministerial or discretionary is a question of fact for the fact finder); Romano v. City of Derby , 42 Conn. App. 624 , 629 , 681 A.2d 387 (1996) (whether the act complained of is discretionary or ministerial is a factual question which depends upon the nature of the act complained of).
cited Cited "see" Koenig v. Srager, No. Cv 33 86 81 (Sep. 12, 1997)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See Srager v. Koenig, 42 Conn. App. 617 , 681 A.2d 323 cert. denied 239 Conn. 935 -36, 684 A.2d 709 (1996).
cited Cited "see" State v. Downey
Conn. App. Ct. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Panella, 43 Conn. App. 76, 82-83 , 682 A.2d 532 , cert. denied, 239 Conn. 937 , 684 A.2d 710 (1996).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Davis
Conn. · 2002 · signal: see also · confidence low
See id., 723 (concluding that jury could have acquitted defendant on basis of evidence showing that defendant’s actions were intended to defend himself from unprovoked injury by police officer during course of arrest); see also State v. Panella, 43 Conn. App. 76, 80-81 , 682 A.2d 532 , cert. denied, 239 Conn. 937 , 684 A.2d 710 (1996) (upholding instruction to jury that, in considering charges under §§ 53a-167a and 53a-167c, it must determine whether defendant was defending himself against assault by police officer rather than resisting arrest); In re Adalberto S., 27 Conn. App. 49, 58 , 6…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Hebert v. City of Ansonia, No. Cv-98-0063004s (Jun. 11, 2002)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 2002 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Kolaniak v. Board of Education , 28 Conn. App. 277 , 281 , 610 A.2d 193 , (1992) (existence of specific bulletin regarding walkway inspection and maintenance precluded defense of governmental immunity) with Beach v. Regional School District , 42 Conn. App. 542 , 554 , 682 A.2d 118 m, cert. denied 239 Conn. 939 , 684 A.2d 710 (1996) (absence of specific directive and testimony that no prescribed policies allowed finding of discretionary function.).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Shartouni v. Park Cadillac-Olds.-Pontiac, No. Cv98-033 11 52s (Dec. 2, 1999)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 1999 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Cawley v. Schochat , 21 Conn. App. 118 , 121 (1990); see also Srager v. Koenig , 42 Conn. App. 617 , 620 , 681 A.2d 323 , cert denied, 239 Conn. 935 , 684 A.2d 709 (1996).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
ALEXANDRO ROMERO
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 29, 1996.
684 A.2d 710
Lauren Weisfeld, assistant public defender, in support of the petition.
Published

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 42 Conn. App. 555 (AC 15437), is denied.