neutral
Cited (no substantive treatment)
0.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997
2011
2026
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, LICENSING AND REGULATION
v.
Maria M. TAYLOR
v.
Maria M. TAYLOR
58, Sept. Term, 1996.
Court of Appeals of Maryland.
Mar 10, 1997.
Michele J. McDonald, Assistant Attorney General (J. Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, on brief), Baltimore, for Petitioner., Joel A. Smith (Kahn, Smith & Collins, P.A., Christine L. Neff, on brief), Baltimore, amicus curiae for respondent.
Cited by 18 opinions | Published
PER CURIAM.
For the reasons set forth in the “Discussion” portion of Judge Hollander’s comprehensive opinion for the Court of Special Appeals in this unemployment compensation case, Dept. of Economic and Employment Development v. Taylor, 108 Md.App. 250, 263-283, 671 A.2d 523, 530-540 (1996), we shall affirm the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals.
JUDGMENT AFFIRMED, WITH COSTS.