Zoning Inspector v. Plunske, 718 A.2d 16 (Conn. 1998). · Go Syfert
Search
Zoning Inspector v. Plunske, 718 A.2d 16 (Conn. 1998). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
33 citation events (24 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Albright-Lazzari v. Freedom of Information Commission (connappct, 2012-06-05)
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998 2012 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Albright-Lazzari v. Freedom of Information Commission
Conn. App. Ct. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
Although the present case is in a different procedural posture because the plaintiff requested the records directly from the department, it is important to note that the parent of a minor child is not unequivocally entitled to confidential records pertaining to that child. 8 Judge McWeeny also emphasized that “not all [department] records are exempt from [the act] under § 17a-28. . . . [Department] records that do not pertain to child protection activities are subject to disclosure under [the act].” Marlow v. Freedom of Information Commission, supra, Superior Court, Docket No. CV-99-04931…
cited Cited "see" State v. McFarlane
Conn. App. Ct. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See id., 372 .
discussed Cited "see" State v. Fleming
Conn. App. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Williams, 48 Conn. App. 361, 372 , 709 A.2d 43 (jury can infer gun barrel *349 less than twelve inches by ability to handle firearm with one hand), cert. denied, 245 Conn. 907 , 718 A.2d 16 (1998).
cited Cited "see" State v. Gonzalez
Conn. App. Ct. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Williams, 48 Conn. App. 361, 367 , 709 A.2d 43 , cert. denied, 245 Conn. 907 , 718 A.2d 16 (1998).
discussed Cited "see" Bailey v. Medical Examining Board for State Employee Disability Retirement
Conn. App. Ct. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ahern v. State Employees Retirement Commission, 48 Conn. App. 482, 487 , 710 A.2d 1366 (“[t]he right to appeal from a decision of an administrative agency to the Superior Court is a creature of statute”), cert. denied, 245 Conn. 911 , 718 A.2d 16 (1998).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Prudhomme
Conn. App. Ct. · 2022 · signal: see also · confidence low
In determining whether an out-of-court state- ment is offered for the truth of the matter asserted, and thus is hearsay, ‘‘the matter asserted [is] the matter asserted by the writing or speech, not the matter asserted by the proponent of the evidence.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Esposito, 223 Conn. 299, 315 , 613 A.2d 242 (1992); see also State v. Williams, 48 Conn. App. 361 , 368–69, 709 A.2d 43 (‘‘[t]he matter asserted [in an out-of-court statement is] the matter asserted by the writing or speech, not the matter asserted by the proponent of the evidence’’…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
ZONING INSPECTOR OF THE TOWN OF REDDING
v.
RAYMOND PLUNSKE
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jun 10, 1998.
718 A.2d 16
Nancy Burton, in support of the petition., James T. Shearin, in opposition.
Published

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 48 Conn. App. 422 (AC 15312), is denied.