green
Positive treatment
3.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Artis
See State v. Barnett, 53 Conn. App. 581, 592-93 , 734 A.2d 991 , cert. denied, 250 Conn. 918 , 738 A.2d 659 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
Gianetti v. Connecticut Newspapers Publishing Co.
See State v. Barnett, 53 Conn. App. 581, 598-99 , 734 A.2d 991 , cert. denied, 250 Conn. 918 , 738 A.2d 659 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Giovanni C.
See [State v. Barnett, 53 Conn. App. 581, 598 , 734 A.2d 991 , cert. denied, 250 Conn. 918 , 738 A.2d 659 (1999)]; State v. Rodriguez, 44 Conn. App. 818, 823 , 692 A.2d 846 , cert. denied, 242 Conn. 902 , 697 A.2d 363 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Saracino v. HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES
Our Supreme Court has determined that when a plaintiff interposes different legal theories from those asserted in a prior pending action, dismissal is appropriate when such theories are "merely different ways to characterize how the defendant's actions resulted in liability to the plaintiff." Beaudoin v. Town Oil Co., supra, 207 Conn, at 587, 542 A.2d 1124 ; see also Sandvig v. A. Debreuil & Sons, Inc., 53 Conn.App. 466, 469 , 730 A.2d 646 , cert. denied, 250 Conn. 920 , 738 A.2d 659 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Saracino v. Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.
Our Supreme Court has determined that when a plaintiff interposes different legal theories from those asserted in a prior pending action, dismissal is appropriate when such theories are “merely different ways to characterize how the defendant’s actions resulted in liability to the plaintiff.” Beaudoin v. Town Oil Co., supra, 207 Conn. 587 ; see also Sandvig v. A. Debreuil & Sons, Inc., 53 Conn. App. 466, 469 , 730 A.2d 646 , cert. denied, 250 Conn. 920 , 738 A.2d 659 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Morgan
See also State v. Barnett, 53 Conn. App. 581, 600-603 , 734 A.2d 991 (applying same analysis to double jeopardy claim under subdivisions [1] and [4] of § 53a-59), cert. denied, 250 Conn. 918 , 738 A.2d 659 (1999).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY
v.
GEORGE M. REIDER, JR., INSURANCE COMMISSIONER
v.
GEORGE M. REIDER, JR., INSURANCE COMMISSIONER
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 9, 1999.
Ralph G. Elliot, in support of the petition., William J. Prensky, assistant attorney general, in opposition.
Published
The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 54 Conn. App. 77 (AC 18058), is denied.
[*929] Decided September 9, 1999 Ralph G. Elliot, in support of the petition. William J. Prensky, assistant attorney general, in opposition.