green
Positive treatment
1.8 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Hammond v. Commissioner of Correction
See Hammond v. Commissioner of Correction, 251 Conn. 919, 920 , 742 A.2d 358 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Taylor v. BARBERINO
Because they are not parties to this appeal, we refer to Seward and Monde as the defendant in this opinion. 2 The record does not contain a written agreement between the parties. 3 Barberino is the brother of Taylor. 4 Although the summary judgment rendered by the court pertained only to count three of the plaintiffs’ complaint, it is well established that “[a] judgment disposing of only a part of a complaint, counterclaim, or cross complaint is a final judgment if that judgment disposes of all causes of action in that complaint, counterclaim, or cross complaint brought by or against a par…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
FIRST CHURCH OF CHRIST, SCIENTIST
v.
HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION OF THE TOWN OF RIDGEFIELD
v.
HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION OF THE TOWN OF RIDGEFIELD
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 18, 1999.
Sharon Wicks Domfeld, in support of the petition., J. Allen Kerr, Jr., in opposition.
Published
The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 55 Conn. App. 59 (AC 18423), is denied.
SULLIVAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.