green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
3.1 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 2001 ·
…an agency is not afforded special deference when its determination of a question of law has not previously been the subject of judicial scrutiny
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Pleszko v. Zoning Board of Appeals, No. Cv98 034 95 04 (Apr. 17, 2001)
(2×)
an agency is not afforded special deference when its determination of a question of law has not previously been the subject of judicial scrutiny
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McCoy v. Brown
The trial court’s findings are binding upon this court unless they are clearly erroneous in light of the evidence and the pleadings in the record as a whole.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Neubig v. Luanci Construction, LLC, 124 Conn. App. 425, 433 , 4 A.3d 1273 (2010). *708 Any mortgage contingency clause implies “a promise that the purchaser will exert reasonable efforts to obtain a mortgage commitment.” Phillipe v. Thomas, 3 Conn. App. 471, 473 , 489 A.2d 1056 (1985); see also Barber v. Jacobs, 58 Conn. App. 330, 335 , 753 A.2d 430 , cert. denied, 254 Conn. 920 , 759 A.2d 1023…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Grasso v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the Groton Long Point Ass'n
(2×)
See, e.g., Borden v. Planning & Zoning Commission, 58 Conn. App. 399 , 755 A.2d 224 , cert. denied, 254 Conn. 921 , 759 A.2d 1023 (2000); Masayda v. Pedroncelli, 43 Conn. App. 443 , 683 A.2d 23 (1996); Prospect Gardens Convalescent Home, Inc. v. Norwalk, 32 Conn. Sup. 214 , 347 A.2d 637 (1975).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
MILDRED B. BORDEN
v.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE TOWN OF NORTH STONINGTON
v.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE TOWN OF NORTH STONINGTON
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 2, 2000.
Elissa T. Wright, in support of the petition., Richard S. Cody, in opposition.
Published
Citer courts: Connecticut Superior Court (2)
No opinion found.Click here to view source material.