Harold Cohn & Co. v. Harco Int'l, LLC, 810 A.2d 269 (Conn. 2002). · Go Syfert
Harold Cohn & Co. v. Harco Int'l, LLC, 810 A.2d 269 (Conn. 2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
23 citation events (23 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Biro v. Matz (connappct, 2011-11-29)
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Biro v. Matz
Conn. App. Ct. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See Harold Cohen & Co. v. Harco International, LLC, 72 Conn. App. 43, 50-51 , 804 A.2d 218 , cert. denied, 262 Conn. 903 , 810 A.2d 269 (2002); Dorsey v. Mancuso, 23 Conn. App. 629, 633 , 583 A.2d 646 (1990), cert. denied, 217 Conn. 809 , 585 A.2d 1234 (1991).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Sean O'Kane A.I.A. Architect, P.C. v. Puljic
Conn. App. Ct. · 2014 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Deleo v. Nusbaum, supra, 586-97 (describing continuous representation doctrine as “tolling” statute of limitations). 4 The plaintiff also relies on Mitchell v. Guardian Systems, Inc., 72 Conn. App. 158 , 804 A.2d 1004 , cert. denied, 262 Conn. 903 , 810 A.2d 269 (2002).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
HAROLD COHN & COMPANY, INC.
v.
HARCO INTERNATIONAL, LLC
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 23, 2002.
810 A.2d 269
John H. Lindsay, in support of the petition., Christopher J. McCarthy, in opposition.
Published