green
Positive treatment
9.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. Mollo
See Franklin Credit Management Corp. v. Nicholas , 73 Conn. App. 830 , 838, 812 A.2d 51 (2002), cert. denied, 262 Conn. 937 , 815 A.2d 136 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Oreoluwa O.
See In re Vincent B., 73 Conn. App. 637 , 646–47, 809 A.2d 1119 (2002) (concerns regarding father’s perceived plans after reunification did not relieve department from making reasonable efforts to achieve reunifica- tion), cert. denied, 262 Conn. 934 , 815 A.2d 136 (2003).10 In the present case the trial court’s finding that the department made reasonable efforts was based on the following facts: (1) the department maintained commu- nication with the respondent; (2) the department con- tacted the resource named by the respondent who resided in the United States; and (3) the department at…
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Oreoluwa O.
See In re Vincent B., 73 Conn.App. 637 , 646-47, 809 A.2d 1119 (2002) (concerns regarding father's perceived plans after reunification did not relieve department from making reasonable efforts to achieve reunification), cert. denied, 262 Conn. 934 , 815 A.2d 136 (2003). 10 In the present case the trial court's finding that the department made reasonable efforts was based on the following facts: (1) the department maintained communication with the respondent; (2) the department contacted the resource named by the respondent who resided in the United States; and (3) the department attempted unsu…
discussed
Cited "see"
GMAC Mortgage, LLC v. Ford
See Franklin Credit Management Corp. v. Nicholas, 73 Conn. App. 830, 838 , 812 A.2d 51 (2002), cert. denied, 262 Conn. 937 , 815 A.2d 136 (2003); Bank of America, FSB v. Hanlon, 65 Conn. App. 577, 581 , 783 A.2d 88 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Jorden R.
See In re Jorden R., supra, 28. 18 The Appellate Court relied heavily on In re Vincent B., 73 Conn. App. 637, 644 , 809 A.2d 1119 (2002), cert. denied, 262 Conn. 934 , 815 A.2d 136 (2003), in deciding that the department had a continuing duty to provide the respondent with reunification services.
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Sarah S.
See In re Vincent B., 73 Conn. App. 637, 640-41 , 809 A.2d 1119 (2002), cert. denied, 262 Conn. 934 , 815 A.2d 136 (2003).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Jorden R.
See In re Vincent B., 73 Conn. App. 637, 640-41 , 809 A.2d 1119 (2002), cert. denied, 262 Conn. 934 , 815 A.2d 136 (2003).
cited
Cited "see"
Rollar Construction & Demolition, Inc. v. Granite Rock Associates, LLC
See Franklin Credit Management Corp. v. Nicholas, 73 Conn. App. 830, 838 , 812 A.2d 51 (2002), cert. denied, 262 Conn. 937 , 815 A.2d 136 (2003).
cited
Cited "see"
In re William H.
See Franklin Credit Management Corp. v. Nicholas, 73 Conn. App. 830, 839 , 812 A.2d 51 (2002), cert. denied, 262 Conn. 937 , 815 A.2d 136 (2003).
cited
Cited "see"
Brinson v. Finlay Bros. Printing Co.
See Gillis v. White Oak Corp., 73 Conn. App. 523, 527-28 , 808 A.2d 712 (2002), cert. granted on other grounds, 262 Conn. 936 , 815 A.2d 136 (2003) (appeal withdrawn March 28, 2003).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Assn. v. Virgulak
See, e.g., id. ‘‘In order to establish a prima facie case in a mortgage foreclosure action, the plaintiff must prove by a prepon- derance of the evidence that it is the owner of the note and mortgage, that the defendant mortgagor has defaulted on the note and that any conditions precedent to foreclosure, as established by the note and mortgage, have been satisfied.’’ GMAC Mortgage, LLC v. Ford, 144 Conn. App. 165, 176 , 73 A.3d 742 (2013), citing Franklin Credit Management Corp. v. Nicholas, 73 Conn. App. 830, 838 , 812 A.2d 51 (2002), cert. denied, 262 Conn. 937 , 815 A.2d 136 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bank of America, N.A. v. Aubut
Thus, a court may properly grant summary judgment as to liability in a foreclosure action if the complaint and supporting affidavits establish an undisputed prima facie case and the defendant fails to assert any legally sufficient special defense." (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Strong, 149 Conn.App. 384 , 390-92, 89 A.3d 392 , cert. denied, 312 Conn. 923 , 94 A.3d 1202 (2014) ; accord GMAC Mortgage, LLC v. Ford, 144 Conn.App. 165 , 176, 73 A.3d 742 (2013) ; see also Franklin Credit Management Corp. v. Nicholas, 73 Conn.App. 830 , 838, 812 A.2d …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Tremaine C.
(2×)
Compare In re Vincent B., 73 Conn.App. 637, 645 , 809 A.2d 1119 ("respondent's positive step in participating in a treatment program demonstrated a degree of rehabilitation in itself"), cert. denied, 262 Conn. 934 , 815 A.2d 136 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Anthony H.
See id., 240; see also In re Migdalia M., 6 Conn. App. 194, 202-203 , 504 A.2d 533 (rehabilitation with regard to parents of limited intellectual ability and medically frail child), cert. denied, 199 Conn. 809 , 508 A.2d 770 (1986). *763 The respondent also relies on language from In re Vincent B., 73 Conn. App. 637, 645 , 809 A.2d 1119 (2002), cert. denied, 262 Conn. 934 , 815 A.2d 136 (2003).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
FRANKLIN CREDIT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
v.
THOMAS J. NICHOLAS
v.
THOMAS J. NICHOLAS
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jan 14, 2003.
Matthew B. Woods, in support of the petition., Lloyd L. Langhammer, in opposition.
Published
No opinion found.Click here to view source material.