green
Positive treatment
2.9 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. VanDeusen
See State v. Wright, 77 Conn. App. 80, 93 , 822 A.2d 940 (fleeing with codefen- dant who remained in possession of gun after shooting is indicative of intent to commit murder), cert. denied, 266 Conn. 913 , 833 A.2d 466 (2003); State v. Patterson, 229 Conn. 328, 334 , 641 A.2d 123 (1994) (concealment of weapon after crime establishes consciousness of guilt); see also State v. Booth, supra, 250 Conn. 657 (‘‘the jury reasonably could have concluded that [the defendant] lied to the police to cover up his part in the crime’’).
discussed
Cited "see"
Greenfield v. Reynolds
To that end, “§ 8-12 was enacted to provide local zoning enforcement officers with a means of enforcing their regulations . . . .” Fisette v. DePietro, 28 Conn. App. 379, 387 , 611 A.2d 417 (1992); accord Stamford v. Stephenson, 78 Conn. App. 818, 826, 829 A.2d 26 (purpose of § 8-12 is to provide means to enforce zoning regulations and to prevent unlawful use of buildings), cert. denied, 266 Conn. 915 , 833 A.2d 466 (2003).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
EDWARD ANDREWS
v.
COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION
v.
COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 1, 2003.
Alan E. Dillon, special public defender, in support of the petition., Nancy L. Chupak, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published
The petitioner Edward Andrews’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 77 Conn. App. 903 (AC 22661), is denied.
Nancy L. Chupak, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided October 1, 2003